There are hundreds of G-SYNC and FreeSync monitors now. I've seen FreeSync with less ghosting/coronas than G-SYNC.Dirty Scrubz wrote: ↑28 Apr 2020, 22:54Ok again what you wrote is wrong but keep thinking you know what you're talking about.
It is true that usually NVIDIA native G-SYNC provides a vastly superior experience for the reasons that I explained (Overdrive Rabbit Hole). With the right panel, it is truly a sight to behold that having continuously variable refresh rate without overdrive artifacts. It's truly fantastic and hats off to NVIDIA for what they successfully achieved with G-SYNC. Blur Busters has both the FreeSync and G-SYNC list.
That said, not to diminish the value proposition of FreeSync. There are some really great implementations that looks superior to the worst G-SYNC monitors. I've seen awful ghosting/coronas on some native G-SYNC monitors, especially when something happened like panel factory run modification -- caused major GtG changes -- to cause the NVIDIA special sauce overdrive to become bad (overdrive algorithm mismatch to the panel). It has happened before.
Sheer fast pixel response can compensate for the last of variable overdrive. That alone, can tip the scales. That's part of the new G-SYNC Compatible certified program, that the pixel response is sufficient fast enough to look acceptable without all the lovely G-SYNC overdrive.
Because of that, put down the pitch forks. Both of you are right because the venn diagram overlaps. It's not a holy war, PC vs Mac, Android vs iPhone, FreeSync vs G-SYNC. They both peacefully exist.
The G-SYNC cost premium is actually worth it but it's perfectly okay to avoid paying the premium. You could do more homework to find the best FreeSync / G-SYNC Compatible implementations. It's the customer's choice.