RLCScontender wrote:
btw, to anyone reading, just ignore the trolls/shit posters. There are a lot of disgruntled TN users who are trying to cope. As i've stated, i'm not here to start a heated debate about their coping mechanisms. I've been fairly transparent with my tests, the tests i've used, and i've used excessive amounts of photos/videos/etc backing up almost everything i've said.
RLCScontender wrote: ↑16 Jun 2020, 18:35
They have WORDS,
while i have THIS
I do not need a photodiode to understand that all the monitors in this g-sync picture and all have different input lags.
- fdffdfdf.png (7.81 KiB) Viewed 6496 times
I do not need a photodiode to know that they have the exact same g-sync module installed as in the first g-sync monitor. An exception is a monitor with g-sync2 and active cooling.
After blocking from the chief. You wrote low-key posts for a month. Has anyone come to your topic and start to bother you? I do not see these posts. But you again began to turn this forum into a ips vs tn war.
Let's remember how it was.
RLCScontender wrote: ↑11 May 2020, 22:54
ya i do apologize for bashing TN. Even if what i posted was truthful, some people find it insulting if i did. That is the gist of the heated debates.
Its not something ppl want to hear regardless if it's true. The same way if i go to a religious event and i blurted out that religion is false.
Anyways, i sincerely apologize to the TN owners who feel insulted. If TN is your preference, more power to ya. Not here to convince u otherwise.
And a month later, you again set to work on the old.
RLCScontender wrote: ↑16 Jun 2020, 13:22
if you put the 240hz g sync predator against the fastest TN,
the fastest TN will lose. The response time differences are SO negligible that it's literally impossible to tell the difference in practice in my opinion. however, the input lag is night and day. The input lag is LOWER on the predator AND LOWER accross the refresh rate range. Whereas the fastest TN, the input lag starts to get horrendous the moment the FPS dips below 240hz.
TFT central posted these input lag results. The fastest TN Acer Nitro XF252Q has way more input lag than the acer nitro xv273x(t
he same exact panel and release date as the xb273x, difference is the predator has instantaneous no input lag thx to g-sync scaler and way better response times).
Yes, a monitor with a g-sync module in the vast majority of cases gives a smaller input lag at a frequency of 60. But what does this have to do with ips or tn? As if there is only ips240g-sync, and tn240g-sync does not exist.
RLCScontender wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 01:32
the fastest TN has more input lag and
it gets UGLY if you play at lower refresh rates. For example, the Alienware aw2521hf's input lag is generally consistent throughout its refresh rate range, Even on 60hz, the input lag is still low(240hz, it's almost as low as the acer clone). But when i had the omen x27, the input lag was unbearable (especially at 60hz). Even the fastest TN omen x25f, the input lag gets UGLY if the FPS is below 240hz(according to rtings).
One gets the feeling that x25f and fx252q are two monitors on this planet.
Please contact the moderators if you think that I’m trolling you and lying to your topic. Let's see how it ends.
I often do not clearly state my thoughts. google translate is far from perfect. And in addition to the translator, I myself am mistaken. Do not take me seriously.
