VG259QM help settings

[ClowRRR]

hello, i need best settings for low input lag

thanks

[axaro1]

Absolute lowest input lag is going to be 280hz OD80 Adaptive sync OFF, ELMB-Sync OFF.

[PMaestro]

Absolute lowest input lag is going to be 280hz OD80 Adaptive sync OFF, ELMB-Sync OFF.

Hey,
Would you say there is a better TN panel out there than this for motion handling? I want the best motion handling and lowest input lag.

Im using this and really happy with it but while i am there is a picky/annoying side to me thats wondering if a TN panel could give me better performance for fps games lol. I normally hit over 270 fps easy.

Thanks.

[axaro1]

Hey,
Would you say there is a better TN panel out there than this for motion handling? I want the best motion handling and lowest input lag.

Im using this and really happy with it but while i am there is a picky/annoying side to me thats wondering if a TN panel could give me better performance for fps games lol. I normally hit over 270 fps easy.

Thanks.

In terms of g2g and motion clarity the new IPS generation is more in line with the early TN generation, all 240hz IPS perform similarly to monitors such as the PG258Q (240hz TN).

If you are talking about motion clarity the new TN panels (such as the XL2546, both with Dyac ON and OFF) win over IPS (even tho being able to overclock to 280hz definitely mitigate the advantage, strobing at 280hz is very good on this monitor and it can highly improve motion clarity).

IDK about input lag on the VG259QM (since there are still no reviews) but I think it is in line with the 27" version of this monitor (VG279QM).
All 240hz IPS monitors share a very low input lag, more specifically signal processing is extremely low and often much better than 240hz TN.




The only 240hz TN monitor that I would swap for my VG259QM is the XL2546S (I would definitely miss the angles, 10bit color reproduction and 280hz. Benq's motion clarity with Dyac is #1, it is the best competitive monitor you can get) but unfortunately the price difference is massive and imo not worth it (+200$ is a lot).

[PMaestro]

Hey,
Would you say there is a better TN panel out there than this for motion handling? I want the best motion handling and lowest input lag.

Im using this and really happy with it but while i am there is a picky/annoying side to me thats wondering if a TN panel could give me better performance for fps games lol. I normally hit over 270 fps easy.

Thanks.

In terms of g2g and motion clarity the new IPS generation is more in line with the early TN generation, all 240hz IPS perform similarly to monitors such as the PG258Q (240hz TN).

If you are talking about motion clarity the new TN panels (such as the XL2546, both with Dyac ON and OFF) win over IPS (even tho being able to overclock to 280hz definitely mitigate the advantage, strobing at 280hz is very good on this monitor and it can highly improve motion clarity).

IDK about input lag on the VG259QM (since there are still no reviews) but I think it is in line with the 27" version of this monitor (VG279QM).
All 240hz IPS monitors share a very low input lag, more specifically signal processing is extremely low and often much better than 240hz TN.




The only 240hz TN monitor that I would swap for my VG259QM is the XL2546S (I would definitely miss the angles, 10bit color reproduction and 280hz. Benq's motion clarity with Dyac is #1, it is the best competitive monitor you can get) but unfortunately the price difference is massive and imo not worth it (+200$ is a lot).

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

[axaro1]

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

If I was you I'd keep the VG259QM, I don't think the Omen x 25f, the KD25f or the XF252Q are superior to the VG259QM.

[PMaestro]

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

If I was you I'd keep the VG259QM, I don't think the Omen x 25f, the KD25f or the XF252Q are superior to the VG259QM.

Yeah for me the only one that really interests me right now is the XL2546s. once again thanks for the quick reply will see if i can maybe pick one up at some point and compare them side by side or either just take the gamble

[ClowRRR]

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

If I was you I'd keep the VG259QM, I don't think the Omen x 25f, the KD25f or the XF252Q are superior to the VG259QM.

280hz is convenient even if you only have 240 fps and not 280?

[Alpha]

Hey,
Would you say there is a better TN panel out there than this for motion handling? I want the best motion handling and lowest input lag.

Im using this and really happy with it but while i am there is a picky/annoying side to me thats wondering if a TN panel could give me better performance for fps games lol. I normally hit over 270 fps easy.

Thanks.

In terms of g2g and motion clarity the new IPS generation is more in line with the early TN generation, all 240hz IPS perform similarly to monitors such as the PG258Q (240hz TN).

If you are talking about motion clarity the new TN panels (such as the XL2546, both with Dyac ON and OFF) win over IPS (even tho being able to overclock to 280hz definitely mitigate the advantage, strobing at 280hz is very good on this monitor and it can highly improve motion clarity).

IDK about input lag on the VG259QM (since there are still no reviews) but I think it is in line with the 27" version of this monitor (VG279QM).
All 240hz IPS monitors share a very low input lag, more specifically signal processing is extremely low and often much better than 240hz TN.




The only 240hz TN monitor that I would swap for my VG259QM is the XL2546S (I would definitely miss the angles, 10bit color reproduction and 280hz. Benq's motion clarity with Dyac is #1, it is the best competitive monitor you can get) but unfortunately the price difference is massive and imo not worth it (+200$ is a lot).

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

Look hard at the Omen X 25f imo. Its my favorite of my monitors. No idea why but to my eyes (as I understand it between 8%-12% of the population has some form of color blindness so take from this whatever you want lol.). Calibrated to my eyes, my Omen X 27 I'd play Siege @ 1440p 240hz and it looked nearly identical color wise to my LG 850. Only thing that was off was for some reason that TN panel lacked depth to me I can't explain. On my X 25F I literally would not believe it's a TN in front of it. The colors are better than the X 27 and shy of the over saturation the LG has. I am not sure how you rank in Siege but playing in the top .02% I completely understand the competitive advantage a person would want. To me, MW is so poorly optimized with such trash servers its not one I would base my purchase on. Siege though... it's here to stay and likely will see a boost as next gen hits, maybe cross platform and Quarantine comes out. I'm not an expert on the monitor stuff but I do play professionally, if you get a chance to look at a X 25F you should.

I do like that Omen has their command center thing. Its built right into software you can setup and change profiles on. For Siege, your bullets hit where your OSD marker is, same as reticle in game. So if its a dot, the bullet lands there. MW, nothing like that at all. The Omen has the best sight pictures I have seen so far. For COD, theres one thats like { } is awesome because you can use that as the flick and focus on the markers as your eyes change from close to far if that makes sense. If you have just a dot the real aim in MW is not that dot you have on screen as it won't match during recoil with the dot on your optic when firing for example. So you have to change what dot you're using. Another thing is MW has pretty trash graphics. HP+ Enhance or whatever its called can really clean up the image. Sharpens and helps overall so you do not need any AA and it does a gucci job on the jaggies. You can pretty much just set nvidia control panel too sharpen default like .5 and .17 or what ever it is when enabled (not the overlay, the control panel) and not take a performance hit. That and HP+ profile is pretty legit.

Everything has pros and cons. Its fun playing around with various monitors and I plan on picking up a new one soon as they get in stock. That's expecting things I'll like on some vs others. X 25F has been my favorite. At the end of the day I am not sure where the diminishing returns lie and will leave that to the experts!

Way off topic but I threw some Tiger skates on my G502 Lightspeed yesterday and holy &$%!. Try some of those on your mouse if gaming competitively. You'll notice (unless you have a Razor mouse of some sort). Had my aim broke for a bit as I got acclimated but after its like ice. So good!!

[PMaestro]

Hey,
Would you say there is a better TN panel out there than this for motion handling? I want the best motion handling and lowest input lag.

Im using this and really happy with it but while i am there is a picky/annoying side to me thats wondering if a TN panel could give me better performance for fps games lol. I normally hit over 270 fps easy.

Thanks.

In terms of g2g and motion clarity the new IPS generation is more in line with the early TN generation, all 240hz IPS perform similarly to monitors such as the PG258Q (240hz TN).

If you are talking about motion clarity the new TN panels (such as the XL2546, both with Dyac ON and OFF) win over IPS (even tho being able to overclock to 280hz definitely mitigate the advantage, strobing at 280hz is very good on this monitor and it can highly improve motion clarity).

IDK about input lag on the VG259QM (since there are still no reviews) but I think it is in line with the 27" version of this monitor (VG279QM).
All 240hz IPS monitors share a very low input lag, more specifically signal processing is extremely low and often much better than 240hz TN.




The only 240hz TN monitor that I would swap for my VG259QM is the XL2546S (I would definitely miss the angles, 10bit color reproduction and 280hz. Benq's motion clarity with Dyac is #1, it is the best competitive monitor you can get) but unfortunately the price difference is massive and imo not worth it (+200$ is a lot).

Hey,
Thanks for the detailed response. I have actually been paying close attention to this monitor, and its what i was considering swapping to, but it now looks like they have discontinued it and the new version will be coming out in September.
Still i think i would try to pick it up if it was in stock somewhere.
I am also not a fan of the 27 in version as i would just prefer the smaller screen.

Do you know of any other TN panels that can maybe currently compete with the XL2546s maybe the Omen x 25f or the Aorus KD25f?
I wonder if the clarity would still be just as good without Dyac on

Im kinda leaning to staying with my VG259QM just because this seems so long lol but my picky side is like what if i can get better motion clarity and low input time with a TN lol. Im quite the competitive gamer and play a lot of R6 Siege and Modern Warefare

Look hard at the Omen X 25f imo. Its my favorite of my monitors. No idea why but to my eyes (as I understand it between 8%-12% of the population has some form of color blindness so take from this whatever you want lol.). Calibrated to my eyes, my Omen X 27 I'd play Siege @ 1440p 240hz and it looked nearly identical color wise to my LG 850. Only thing that was off was for some reason that TN panel lacked depth to me I can't explain. On my X 25F I literally would not believe it's a TN in front of it. The colors are better than the X 27 and shy of the over saturation the LG has. I am not sure how you rank in Siege but playing in the top .02% I completely understand the competitive advantage a person would want. To me, MW is so poorly optimized with such trash servers its not one I would base my purchase on. Siege though... it's here to stay and likely will see a boost as next gen hits, maybe cross platform and Quarantine comes out. I'm not an expert on the monitor stuff but I do play professionally, if you get a chance to look at a X 25F you should.

I do like that Omen has their command center thing. Its built right into software you can setup and change profiles on. For Siege, your bullets hit where your OSD marker is, same as reticle in game. So if its a dot, the bullet lands there. MW, nothing like that at all. The Omen has the best sight pictures I have seen so far. For COD, theres one thats like { } is awesome because you can use that as the flick and focus on the markers as your eyes change from close to far if that makes sense. If you have just a dot the real aim in MW is not that dot you have on screen as it won't match during recoil with the dot on your optic when firing for example. So you have to change what dot you're using. Another thing is MW has pretty trash graphics. HP+ Enhance or whatever its called can really clean up the image. Sharpens and helps overall so you do not need any AA and it does a gucci job on the jaggies. You can pretty much just set nvidia control panel too sharpen default like .5 and .17 or what ever it is when enabled (not the overlay, the control panel) and not take a performance hit. That and HP+ profile is pretty legit.

Everything has pros and cons. Its fun playing around with various monitors and I plan on picking up a new one soon as they get in stock. That's expecting things I'll like on some vs others. X 25F has been my favorite. At the end of the day I am not sure where the diminishing returns lie and will leave that to the experts!

Way off topic but I threw some Tiger skates on my G502 Lightspeed yesterday and holy &$%!. Try some of those on your mouse if gaming competitively. You'll notice (unless you have a Razor mouse of some sort). Had my aim broke for a bit as I got acclimated but after its like ice. So good!!

Hey thanks for the detailed response.

After some serious gaming sessions on R6 siege, i think i'm going to stick with the XL2546S. at first i wasn't convinced about dyac couldn't really see a big difference however i turned it on and seemed to be doing better with it :/ the VG259QM has some good motion clarity but the BenQ just feels better. I also have two dead pixels on my 259QM, one was in the bottom left which i didn't mind when i received the monitor and then the 2nd just appeared below the centre so im now going to return that. I was actually really close to keeping it but i just seemed to play better on the BenQ

I have heard some good things about the omen x 25f but isnt really no reviews for it apart from Rtings most of the reviews are for the bigger version. I currently sit at plat 1 atm the moment solo que on R6 but i am normally Plat 1-2. im quite competitive at the game but really chilled at the same time. MW isn't so much what i'm concerned about although once again i performed better on the BenQ most of the time.

VG259QM is a good monitor but if your looking for the upmost competitive advantage id say the BenQ is the way to go or as you suggested the omen x 25f

Oh i also have a modified 60g G Pro Wireless with Kailh Red switches and Tiger Arcs on it also paired with a Artisan Hien Xsoft mouse pad. was using a ROG Scabbard before that.