Does having 60FPS using VRR have lower input lag than 60hz? Confused*

[nursejoy]

the thing is I'm not asking if its strange my results are different than Rtings I know why it's different. I wanted to know if the top and bottom results for input lag matter much or even just a little b/c both monitors have an advantage in one of those aspects

The difference you're seeing between the two models probably has to do with how each handle the scanout rate conversion at lower than 240Hz refresh rates.

If your device was capable of measuring at 240Hz, it probably wouldn't show as much of a difference between them.

I see, and does top and bottom lag matter at all (last question) if the differences is 2-3ms

[jorimt]

I see, and does top and bottom lag matter at all (last question) if the differences is 2-3ms

If you're playing at 60Hz, potentially where updates at the very top or bottom of the screen are concerned.

But again, if you're playing at 240Hz, or 60 FPS 240Hz VRR, then what you're device is reading at 60Hz likely isn't an issue at max native Hz on either monitor, as no scanout rate conversion is then taking place.

[nursejoy]

I see, and does top and bottom lag matter at all (last question) if the differences is 2-3ms

If you're playing at 60Hz, potentially where updates at the very top or bottom of the screen are concerned.

But again, if you're playing at 240Hz, or 60 FPS 240Hz VRR, then what you're device is reading at 60Hz likely isn't an issue at max native Hz on either monitor, as no scanout rate conversion is then taking place.

I understand. Thank you so much for all the answers and help!

[jorimt]

I understand. Thank you so much for all the answers and help!

No worries