thanks, absolutely too big for competitive, was in idea for second monitor.Notty_PT wrote: ↑15 Nov 2021, 21:16Asus XG27AQM is an amazing monitor! But it is too big for competitive play in my opinion
It has way less trailing than the NItro 390hz or any other 360hz model, but the image itself will have more blur, if you understand me. Imagine the UFO, with 360hz monitors it has awful trailing, but not on XG27AQM, wich has the Alien on the ufo less clear than the 360hz panels
xv252qf manages to keep up with a good tn on blur only with Mbr active on extreme, without mbr there is a differenceRestTarRr wrote: ↑16 Nov 2021, 04:00You lost all credibility after this line. You are either exaggerating really heavily or you are delusional. Either way, it's much better to keep it objective rather than to get your emotions involved.
Are you buying a monitor for aim training or for gaming? You keep the monitor that you perform the best in the game you want to play.
As for aim training, if you read what I wrote I said I haven't used it for a long time.
I guess you are using acer with mbr to the extreme, right?lizardpeter wrote: ↑16 Nov 2021, 04:38Yeah, COD is my main game at the moment. This is a really neat thread though. It highlights how some people prefer different things. When you said that the Acer couldn’t touch the best TN monitors, you must mean in terms of the percent of pixel transitions completed within the refresh interval. I understand that the clarity with super fast objects might even be worse on the Acer 390 Hz (as you have shown with specific UFO tests) but there certainly is something to be said about the extra refreshes too. After all, it response time was everything then every pro player would be using LG C1. Isn’t Apex bad after 190 FPS? What about Quake? You really need super high FPS to take advantage of the Acer.
But anyway, on COD I’m having great success with the Acer monitor. I already have so many nuclears in COD Vanguard, and that game just launched. I’ve been well within the top 1% in every COD game over the past decade and 0.1% in my favorite titles, so I know a lot about the game and how things should look. The biggest thing for me going to Acer 390 Hz was that I felt like my bad days simply disappeared. More than improving the top end of performance, it seemed to eliminate poor performance almost entirely. I genuinely don’t have any bad games anymore. Not sure if it’s related to the lower latency or not.
If and when better monitors come out, I’ll be happy to upgrade anyway. Unfortunately, I think we’re too far out from OLED or MicroLED high refresh rate displays that will fix the response time issues. Maybe something better will be out later in 2022. I’d be fine with getting a 480 Hz TN monitor alongside something like an RTX 4090 and Intel 13th gen CPU to push those frames. Basically, it’s just a waiting game now.