Reasons to switch back to BenQ FastTN?

High Hz on OLED produce excellent strobeless motion blur reduction with fast GtG pixel response. It is easier to tell apart 60Hz vs 120Hz vs 240Hz on OLED than LCD, and more visible to mainstream. Includes WOLED and QD-OLED displays.
User avatar
kyube
Posts: 931
Joined: 29 Jan 2018, 12:03

Re: Reasons to switch back to BenQ FastTN?

Post by kyube » 11 Jul 2026, 06:54

MSIfanboy wrote:
10 Jul 2026, 19:53
--snip--
The XL2586X should have the highest voltage amplitude & thus the best brightness, even on its most aggresive setting (DyAc2=Premium)
I am impressed by the PG248Q@500Hz & surprised by how much artifacting the XL2586X has at 500Hz.
Thank you for the UFOs!
They're all definitely 1px/s, which means it's at least ≤25% pulse width on their best modes :D

What PW setting did you use on the PG248QP?
j1ffrey wrote:
10 Jul 2026, 20:28
What about AMA? I currently use high bc I think it has less overshoot than premium. I also have a custom setting for AMA which is a slider from 0-30.
Also is there a way to change the position of the "crosstalk band" I think it's called? I did that with the strobe utility on my old XL2546 but last I remember trying the strobe utility didn't work with X model.
I don't have the data on which AMA is the best for the XL2546X.
You'll have to rely on your own eyesight in that regard :D
Crosstalk is a byproduct of slow G2G RT.
You aren't able to adjust the region in which crosstalk appears on DyAc2 displays, as far as I know.

Post Reply