Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
Yes I did that, but using a non native resolution without any full screen scaling (black bars around the image) will add input lag! So that´s a no go to me1000WATT wrote:Notty_PT
Have you tried changing 24.5 to 23? It saves my eyes in fps games on a 27 inch monitor. 27 - 24.5. (2560x1440 - 2330x1310).
Is it really so important to have 1920x1080?
Where did you see that? Afaik they are both rated as 1ms. And tbh I don´t find the XG25 faster response time wise compared to XG24! My XG24 has faster overdrive and less artifacts. Is just the bad coating and higher input lag than the XG25. Did you try already to put them side by side with "Extended" on Windows desktop and drag the mouse around?pox02 wrote: Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1
Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)
Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray),0.5ms (Gray to Gray, Min) now make sense why xg258q faster then 248q
https://www.asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-St ... fications/Notty_PT wrote:Where did you see that? Afaik they are both rated as 1ms. And tbh I don´t find the XG25 faster response time wise compared to XG24! My XG24 has faster overdrive and less artifacts. Is just the bad coating and higher input lag than the XG25. Did you try already to put them side by side with "Extended" on Windows desktop and drag the mouse around?pox02 wrote: Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1
Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)
Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray),0.5ms (Gray to Gray, Min) now make sense why xg258q faster then 248q