Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
they speak very well of the acer but I have not found any reviews with precise information on response times and any ghosting or overshot at intermediate fq.
RTINGS, my personal favorite source for that stuff, should be reviewing the monitor soon. Generally, these new Fast IPS panels are about as fast as the best TN panels. However, the pixel response time is competing against those 240 Hz TN panels. In reality, these Fast IPS panels are not fast enough for a true 390 Hz experience, but they are faster than many of the well-known 240 Hz panels like the Zowie XL2546K that everyone talks about. However, response time is not everything. Sure, not every pixel transition can complete within the refresh interval, but having the higher refresh rate helps with MPRT, lowers motion blur, and decreases latency.IIISLIDEIII wrote: ↑26 Oct 2021, 22:50they speak very well of the acer but I have not found any reviews with precise information on response times and any ghosting or overshot at intermediate fq.
I have to consider that the range on which I would go to use it is 200 fps and certainly not 390.
I rarely use gsynclizardpeter wrote: ↑27 Oct 2021, 04:23If you use GSYNC, I would probably recommend something else, however. I don’t use GSYNC. The 390 Hz monitor does not have the dedicated GSYNC module, meaning that it lacks variable overdrive.
VG259QM, but if you can find a 2nd gen TN monitor like the X25, XF252Q or the KD25F I would recommend you to get one. They’re just better.
I've been trying a 2546k for 2 days and it's not bad, more responsive and less blur than my 27gn850, the only strange thing is that I notice very little difference between dyac on and off in game, and I was a bit disappointed as to hear a lot of people dyac should change things like day and night.Nm_kng wrote: ↑29 Oct 2021, 23:25VG259QM, but if you can find a 2nd gen TN monitor like the X25, XF252Q or the KD25F I would recommend you to get one. They’re just better.
I'm also checking 27 1440p 240 as the new predator xb273ugx or alienware 2721d or asus, they are all very similar in performance, there is none among them that stands out from the others, maybe predator is a little better of all but is similar.Handler wrote: ↑30 Oct 2021, 14:42Given you have a wide FPS range (150-220 FPS), I would recommend a monitor that has a g-sync module (I know you are not using g-sync but bear with me). When you have a wide FPS range you need a monitor that performs well (pixel response and overshoot) across that range. To get this you (usually) need variable overdrive. Monitors with G-sync modules always have variable overdrive and the implementation is usually good. Hardware Unboxed tests for pixel response and overshoot across the refresh range of the monitor so I would recommend checking their reviews out on YouTube.
One of the best options right now is the Asus PG279QM. The G7 also performs well, but some people report issues with flickering and it has a curve. If you don't have those problems or an issue with the curve then that might be a good option too. Full disclosure, I have the AW2721D and IMHO it's a great option as well. The PG279QM performs slightly better in almost all metrics, but it's also more expensive (especially if you catch the Alienware on sale). Check the Hardware Unboxed reviews for comparisons.
Hope my 2 cents are helpful!
P.S. There are monitors without G-sync modules that have variable overdrive, but it's not as common (though becoming more common) and the tuning is (usually) not as good so make sure you do your research on non g-sync module monitors.
I have a similar experience with BFI on my 390 Hz monitor. In the UFO test it's very apparent that there's a major improvement. In game, I really don't notice anything.IIISLIDEIII wrote: ↑02 Nov 2021, 12:10I've been trying a 2546k for 2 days and it's not bad, more responsive and less blur than my 27gn850, the only strange thing is that I notice very little difference between dyac on and off in game, and I was a bit disappointed as to hear a lot of people dyac should change things like day and night.
there would be the 360hz asus pg259qn which has the gsync module but the catch would be that the new acer nitro xv252qf 390hz has come out which is more performing and costs less than the asus, but does not have the module, only gsync compatibility .....Handler wrote: ↑30 Oct 2021, 14:42Given you have a wide FPS range (150-220 FPS), I would recommend a monitor that has a g-sync module (I know you are not using g-sync but bear with me). When you have a wide FPS range you need a monitor that performs well (pixel response and overshoot) across that range. To get this you (usually) need variable overdrive. Monitors with G-sync modules always have variable overdrive and the implementation is usually good. Hardware Unboxed tests for pixel response and overshoot across the refresh range of the monitor so I would recommend checking their reviews out on YouTube.
One of the best options right now is the Asus PG279QM. The G7 also performs well, but some people report issues with flickering and it has a curve. If you don't have those problems or an issue with the curve then that might be a good option too. Full disclosure, I have the AW2721D and IMHO it's a great option as well. The PG279QM performs slightly better in almost all metrics, but it's also more expensive (especially if you catch the Alienware on sale). Check the Hardware Unboxed reviews for comparisons.
Hope my 2 cents are helpful!
P.S. There are monitors without G-sync modules that have variable overdrive, but it's not as common (though becoming more common) and the tuning is (usually) not as good so make sure you do your research on non g-sync module monitors.