Re: Your Floaty mouse/Desync issue could be placebo.
Posted: 16 Feb 2025, 08:57
placebo is us.
Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
To suggest this GOD doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether GOD exists or not, that is just fact at this point.BumFlannel wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 17:34To suggest this issue doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether it exists or not, that is just fact at this point.
Well that's a stupid analogy. First of all, whether a god exists or not has nothing to do with placebo either. Second, You're comparing religion that's been around and drilled into society since forever to a problem with computers that has become exponentially more apparent since people first started commonly reporting it around 10 years ago. Complaints most commonly come from people who have been gaming for years, accumulating thousands of hours without issue before problems occurred, and when they do it happens suddenly. You very rarely see new comers complaining about this because they don't have anything to compare to, it's the norm to them. You have people who have played a particular game for thousands of hours literally overnight describing that same game as unplayable without ever hearing of such problems before.1000WATT wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 22:11To suggest this GOD doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether GOD exists or not, that is just fact at this point.BumFlannel wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 17:34To suggest this issue doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether it exists or not, that is just fact at this point.
In 2025, this is not so relevant, but in the past, when human life expectancy was much shorter than it is now, children lost their parents at an early age and invented an imaginary parent for themselves. They liked to think that someone was protecting, caring for and loving them.BumFlannel wrote: ↑21 Feb 2025, 00:21
First of all, whether a god exists or not has nothing to do with placebo either.
Your analogy suggests people born and raised in isolation would all simultaneously invent religion with the exact same god and exact same history despite having no prior communication.
No, something doesn't become a fact just because there are lots of people believing the same thing, and even if it did, most people in the gaming community don't believe in such issues, would that turn it into a fact then? Also only 0.01% of the entire gaming community report such things. I speak with property because I'm not someone speaking with just an outside view on the problem, I've had a long journey suffering from and trying things to fix it, the things I read aren't new to me at all. I used to think the same as most of you for years.BumFlannel wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 17:34Except that's not what placebo is. Placebo is when you change something or it is suggested that something has changed so you expect a difference and therefore perceive one.
Suddenly feeling a difference for no reason and nothing to suggest change isn't placebo.
The only thing you are correct about here is when people think they fixed the issue after changing something, they're expecting/looking for a difference and convince themselves there is one. The existence of the issue(or not) in the first place has nothing to do with placebo.
For example, let's say I'm getting 70fps in a game on hardware that pushes 300fps for everyone else. I make some changes hoping to fix the fps but I forget to turn on the fps counter and go by feel "I fixed it, this is way smoother" but I'm actually still getting 70fps. That's placebo, but it doesn't change the fact that I'm still getting shitty fps on hardware that should be pushing way more.
To suggest this issue doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether it exists or not, that is just fact at this point.
It seems you are now at this stage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialismgiggio10 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2025, 06:09No, something doesn't become a fact just because there are lots of people believing the same thing, and even if it did, most people in the gaming community don't believe in such issues, would that turn it into a fact then? Also only 0.01% of the entire gaming community report such things. I speak with property because I'm not someone speaking with just an outside view on the problem, I've had a long journey suffering from and trying things to fix it, the things I read aren't new to me at all. I used to think the same as most of you for years.BumFlannel wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 17:34Except that's not what placebo is. Placebo is when you change something or it is suggested that something has changed so you expect a difference and therefore perceive one.
Suddenly feeling a difference for no reason and nothing to suggest change isn't placebo.
The only thing you are correct about here is when people think they fixed the issue after changing something, they're expecting/looking for a difference and convince themselves there is one. The existence of the issue(or not) in the first place has nothing to do with placebo.
For example, let's say I'm getting 70fps in a game on hardware that pushes 300fps for everyone else. I make some changes hoping to fix the fps but I forget to turn on the fps counter and go by feel "I fixed it, this is way smoother" but I'm actually still getting 70fps. That's placebo, but it doesn't change the fact that I'm still getting shitty fps on hardware that should be pushing way more.
To suggest this issue doesn't exist when so many people describe 1:1 the same symptoms is moronically dismissive. Yes placebo exists around this whole issue, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether it exists or not, that is just fact at this point.
It may be belieavable when you say "lots of people complain about the same thing 1:1 so it is just a fact by now", but this just isn't a deciding factor whatsoever. Taking the religion example, there are 1000s of religions with billions of believers with countless supernatural testimonies. Would every religion be right in their beliefs because of that then? God would at the same time exist and not exist, because there are lots of people on both sides.
Don't get me wrong, this was also something that made me ignore the possibility of it all being placebo, "how come so many people describe the same thing? It must be real". It's interesting, I wrote my thoughts on the main post as to why people might be describing the same thing. But we shouldn't ignore that they aren't exactly the same though! Some say it's only on online games, some say it's on desktop too, only on CS2, only daytime, only desync/only floaty, and so on. People also have different fixes that work for different periods of time which too suggests placebo.
As to it not being placebo, it looks like you understood what I meant and is just trying to go into the semantic of the word, that's irrelevant, as long as what I wrote is understandable that's good enough. This is how we use that word around the forum anyways.
But either way... If I think that my car is going slower than normal without any apparent reason, but it is actually the same speed as always; then it can't be placebo(or wrong belief, etc) anymore? You don't need be aware that something changed in order to have a distorted perception about something, that's why blind tests exist, to diminish the chance of placebo effect.
Using the example of feeling smoother fps but not turning fps counter on: "I feel my mouse is suddenly moving slower/unprecise/floaty" -> proceeds to not do any kind of measurements for these. How is it not the same thing as not having the fps counter on? In both you're relying only on your own judgement, and as I wrote before, that's an invitation to placebo effect(Or wrong belief, however you want to call it)! Which I think that you also agree, because "measuring" fps without an actual counter ins't actually measuring anything.
The problem I describe on the post, and you on your example is the same: not measuring. I think my car is slower; I'll keep thinking it is slower until I decide to measure it and surprise myself that it was the same speed as always, or I'll find out that it was actually going slower than normal. Playing a game or swiping your mouse left/right isn't any kind of measurement, but if someone wanna rely just on their own judgement and on that to confirm that they have any kind of issue, that's on them.
Another thing that might've not been clear enough, is that I didn't decide to live with floaty mouse and made that post because I gave up on trying, I'm actually performing better after I made some tests and started believing the issue to not be real, not only that but the feeling of floatiness/delay is gone too. It is relieving not having to worry about random settings or changes I might make and accidentally bring the issue back. It's the only fix that lasted that long, measuring stuff and noticing it wasn't broken![]()
I understand if it's hard to believe it because I would probably not either, unless that happened to me, but the intent is not "believing" in anything, on the contrary actually, it is to warn people about measuring their setup in order to see if their problem is even real to begin with! The hard to believe part is how strong placebo effect can be, making you swear to be feeling and seeing such things, which surprised me a lot when I found out to be false.
I don't know why I wrote "at this point" at the end of that sentence and I can see how that made what I said unclear. I meant that people coming on here with obscure tweaks claiming to have fixed their problem, IS, in the vast majority of cases, placebo. The fact is that people experiencing placebo doesn't make the problem not exist/doesn't mean they didn't have the problem, and that the initial problem causing people to google and come across these forums also isn't placebo, it can't be, unless they happened upon one of these discussions and decided that they have the problem after the fact when they never noticed a problem before, which was the whole point of my reply.BumFlannel wrote: ↑20 Feb 2025, 17:34but it has absolutely nothing to do with whether it exists or not, that is just fact at this point.
After clarifying what I said previously I agree this isn't a deciding factor, but it is a common factor. I have seen some division when it comes to the issue, but there are sub groups of people with 1:1 matching symptoms and from what I've seen they all seem to have somewhat overlapping symptoms too. Just because every single person that comes here doesn't have all have 1:1 the same symptoms again doesn't dismiss the existence of the problem or suggest placebo. There also could be more than one cause at play that give similar results, or it could be a single cause that results in slightly different, additional, or missing symptoms depending on the combination of their setup.
Sure it can be placebo if someone told you "hey your car is slower than usual" and you start to believe it, or your speedometer recently broke and is saying you're going 40 when you're actually going 50 but you decide you feel like you're going 40. But if you just got in the car and said "hey my car feels slower today" for no apparent reason then that's something you might need to look into to confirm if it actually is or if you're just "going crazy", but it's still not placebo.. The problem is, if there are no tools available to test or the data is misrepresented then there is not much you can do about it. All you have is feel. And when your game is micro stuttering, you can VISUALLY see it micro stuttering and your mouse inputs are like dragging your mouse through treacle then you are not experiencing placebo and you are not misinterpreting, you can visually see it and physically feel it. The only people that can't see it are the people you tell about it on the internet and you cant show it in a video. Look at the issue where people say their framerate looks like low fps but the game is reporting your frame rate to be 500 with good frame times. This wouldn't be placebo or misinterpreting something, this would be outright imagining things and hallucinating if there wasn't actually s real issue going on.
I never said that, I simply said that isn't placebo.
Blind tests only work when the test designer actually knows if there are differences/what the differences actually are/has control over the differences between test environments. Blind tests are irrelevant here because nobody knows the cause, therefore nobody can design a test, therefore nobody can ever claim placebo.
I used the fps example without an fps counter after making tweaks as an example of where placebo would be in effect. When it comes to mouse input that is an incredibly physical and visceral thing where you can 10000% feel when something is off and when something isn't. It's akin to waking up one morning and your right leg has shrunk by 1cm, but obviously you wouldn't know that. You are going to be walking around with your gait "feeling" off and you would have no idea why. It's based on a lifetime of experience of "walking around". You go to the doctor and he says "I see nothing wrong with you, it must be in your head".giggio10 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2025, 06:09Using the example of feeling smoother fps but not turning fps counter on: "I feel my mouse is suddenly moving slower/unprecise/floaty" -> proceeds to not do any kind of measurements for these. How is it not the same thing as not having the fps counter on? In both you're relying only on your own judgement, and as I wrote before, that's an invitation to placebo effect(Or wrong belief, however you want to call it)! Which I think that you also agree, because "measuring" fps without an actual counter ins't actually measuring anything.
The problem I describe on the post, and you on your example is the same: not measuring. I think my car is slower; I'll keep thinking it is slower until I decide to measure it and surprise myself that it was the same speed as always, or I'll find out that it was actually going slower than normal. Playing a game or swiping your mouse left/right isn't any kind of measurement, but if someone wanna rely just on their own judgement and on that to confirm that they have any kind of issue, that's on them.