I completely disagree with that disambiguition.purplemelon1 wrote: ↑Today, 09:28Discorz (or... Someone) on reddit was the one who distinguished motion clarity (track) and motion performance (fixed gaze).
Discorz likely does too.
Don't rely on Reddit too much, it's rare to find good information there...
“Limited” in what sense?purplemelon1 wrote: ↑Today, 09:28At the end of the day with strobing you are limited by the base fps.
“Limited” in the sense of eliminating the stroboscopic effect? Yes, but this is an issue with current sample & hold technologies as well.
“Limited” in terms of eye-tracked motion clarity? This is purely dependant on what pulse width the strobing implementation targets.
The frame rate, when discussing these topics, is usually assumed to be above or equal to the refresh rate.
When the frame rate is below the refresh rate while strobing, you'll experience duplicate image artifacts caused by signal (time-domain) mismatch.
Yes, this occurred on CRT's as well. It's a artifact for any impulse-based solution.
The TestUFO pursuit photographs users post online are a way to measure eye-tracked motion clarity target.purplemelon1 wrote: ↑Today, 09:28At the time they felt there was a lot of posts about taking photos tracking ufos/frogs. Non important stuff.
It's quite important in evaluating dynamic content handling on a display.
