Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
so if im not gonna use dyac 24/7 then i should get a different monitor?PixelDuck87 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2020, 11:12As far as I know zowie monitors were never kings of g2g response or input lag (there were always faster and even cheaper monitors for that.
So in the case of XL2746s price mainly comes from Dyac+ and "hype". (just my opinion based on some observations)
Can only speak for myself... I personally can't dish out close to 700 euro on a monitor like its nothing without having full info on it. I'm going to wait for a PROPER detailed review of the 2746S/2546S first. No way I'm buying into a dyac randomly because some youtubers say it's pretty cool. Waiting for ryzen 4000 before upgrading monitor anyway...
If you’ve got no use for DyAC then there are a lot of other monitors to choose from that offer the same or similar performance. If you can wait, then there are also 360 Hz monitors on their way. Also pixelduck is right, most of the YouTube reviewers are clueless and hype any product they get for free from the manufacturer. There’s only been one website (Korean) that actually bothered measuring performance and even then I don’t think they used an oscilloscope.kofman13 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2020, 11:40so if im not gonna use dyac 24/7 then i should get a different monitor?PixelDuck87 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2020, 11:12As far as I know zowie monitors were never kings of g2g response or input lag (there were always faster and even cheaper monitors for that.
So in the case of XL2746s price mainly comes from Dyac+ and "hype". (just my opinion based on some observations)
This is the latest available news, I believe:nexina7350 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2020, 20:29When are these fabled 360Hz monitors coming? Will they be TN? IPS? I'm wondering if I should upgrade from my XL2411Z (OC'd to 200Hz) or wait a bit.
I think it just stems from fr33thy. Well here's what Chief says
Chief Blur Buster wrote: ↑06 Jun 2014, 18:35The difference of input lag between DisplayPort vs HDMI vs DVI is less than 1 millisecond. So it's not a significant deal.MonarchX wrote:I've seen some info that DisplayPort may reduce the amount of input lag in comparison to HDMI and DVI-Dual Link. I didn't believe it, but maybe I was wrong. DisplayPort can also support more colors or so say the system specs, but AFAIK, that doesn't mean that the monitor itself supports that many. For 120Hz displays such as Eizo FG2421, would there be an advantage to use one port over another?
However, DisplayPort has the convenient ability to pre-transmit frames faster than a refresh cycle. Not all monitors take advantage of this, but some monitors (e.g. GSYNC) takes advantage of a faster transmission by pushing the frame from the computer to the monitor as fast as possible, independently of the current refresh rate. In the real world, the latency differences of different cable technologies usually won't be measurable in the fluctuations of other parts of the input lag chain.
<advanced-display-geek-tip>There is a way to reduce input lag further even on DVI via large vertical total tweaks (ToastyX Pixel Patcher + ToastyX CRU or NVIDIA Custom Resolution), such as using a 1502-scanline vertical total for a 1920x1080 signal, to force a higher dotclock at the same refreshrate/same framerate. This creates a higher dotclock (by padding the end of a refresh cycle with a large synchronization interval) that transmits the frame faster from the GPU to the monitor, reducing average input lag -- but only by one millisecond -- and impacts VSYNC ON more than VSYNC OFF -- and only on certain models of monitors capable of syncing to these unusually large blanking intervals -- and of those that do, properly scans out the refreshes out faster without a higher refresh rate. One example is the BENQ Z-Series monitor in Instant Mode</advanced-display-geek-tip>
TL;DR: The differences in input lag for DVI vs HDMI vs DisplayPort is less than a millisecond difference, for a given resolution & refresh.