Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
Using only one, had to rollback to older drivers, the last WQHL ones... from August
lizardpeter wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 15:09Where’d you see that TN 360 Hz monitors were coming out soon?
Where did you download that driver? can you send me a link if possible? or give me version name. I want to see if that fixes my issue aswellNotty_PT wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 16:54Using only one, had to rollback to older drivers, the last WQHL ones... from August
This is the problem with AMD.. I am sure the next drivers Will break monitor overclocking again
lizardpeter wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 15:09Where’d you see that TN 360 Hz monitors were coming out soon?
Here:
https://www.displayninja.com/new-monitors/
Oh you have a AMD card aswell, does 390hz work when for you when you have 2 monitors plugged in?. After doing a ton of googling/research i suspect it might only work on Nvidia cards.ms.potatoe wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 17:10Better tracking and flicking here, Kovaaks and in game. Others monitors XL2546K, VG279QM.
AMD 21.9.2 works fine at 390Hz with my 6800XT.
I am anxiously waiting for mine in the mail. That is interesting that you found it to be much smoother. What settings are you using? I've heard that the extreme overdrive setting is surprisingly good. I know that often times the fastest setting is pretty bad.BTRY B 529th FA BN wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 22:11Is there any way to convert the PG259QNR to the 25XV2Q Acer AOPEN 390Hz? Stupid question but I gotta ask it.. everything is being hacked these days..
Only gamed on the Fire Legend for 2hrs but it's extremely smooth: smoother than the PG259QNR I have by a lot. Games played, UT4 250fps limit/cap, CS:GO capped at 390fps. Seems a bit darker than the Asus, though.
I definitely appreciate striving for the best image clarity, but I think it's a little hyperbolic to say the Acer is making you "way worse" at games. Even pro players don't split hairs that much. The fact is both the Acer and the most matured TN panels have excellent pixel response times. That's not the say there isn't a difference in motion clarity between these monitors, it's just that the difference is simply not great enough to have any significant effect on in-game performance (beyond placebo/bias).Notty_PT wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 14:41
Of course! If you are running a game with more than 240fps you will for sure notice it at 240hz, while at 390hz your monitor will display every frame. I mean, that is easily noticeable, but does it make you play better with all that blur fest? It does nothing for me on Quake, I track way worse as the images are not clear. And what about fast flicks? Total nightmare compared to a good and matured 240hz panel
With these models I feel like playing on an very low input lag responsive mouse, with no frame skipping at all
but...
coupled with "10 years ago" awful pixel response time levels.
Maybe the upcoming TN 0,5ms 360hz panels, releasing soon, will be faster. I guess.
