lizardpeter wrote: ↑29 Sep 2021, 19:17
lyrill wrote: ↑29 Sep 2021, 19:10
monitor.....duh
It is not my fault you don't clarify what you are talking about. You know there are separate settings in the NVIDIA Control Panel and the monitor itself, right? And the message from me that you quoted was actually in response to a post by the Chief that was talking about changing it in the NVIDIA Control Panel and the monitor.
Why do you keep attacking people though? Everyone is just trying to have an intelligent conversation.
attacking who? I am that everybody too. What fault? I don't use Nvidia panel to change anything
for the monitor basics, this is monitor thread. You yourself were exactly talking about monitor setup numbers, what do you not get that I should have specified??? I don't know what quote you are talking about but as you can tell I don't visit this thread often even though I'm most equipped to talk about THE TOPIC AT HAND. BECAUSE I don't want to upset people in the first place. OK? But I have to check it at some point you know, if people are still talking about it months after they got it even though that was months after I got it, why can't I chime in again? And going through a long chunk of "unread" is not easy to begin with. Nobody bothered to reply to me either, I didn't have to bother but here I am. That makes me virtuous, not weak. Please try consider/appreciate all that on top of your suddenly being unwelcoming. Just read my comments and glean what you want, or not. Completely like, up to you sir. Just go through informational stuff ok and ignore what you don't like ok from me or anyone? I'll try as well thank you all.
I went back to read 3 posts of mine and it's clear that you were just projecting. I've always only talked about the big picture. If you are going to quote random Chief quotes, he said keep the flaming in the gaming not the forum. It's easy to not admit to truth being told, and one of them is that quake champions is not a successful game and not a full realization of what people tout as its legacy. What's at the central core of it, is the
lack of nuance of gunplay. And that is dictated by
lack of nuance in map design. On the complete opposite of that, is PUBG and WT, both predating this "modern title". In other words, people who were playing quake prior to qc were literally stuck in the very past, where as people who were playing PUBG and prior to that WT already moved on to, at least at the time, much greener pastures. And they are still a lot less dead than QC, 4 and 6 years past (excluding obscure alpha periods). Not every thread reply needs to be me inserting an essay let alone thesis length that it takes to educate every next dude why these titles are superior than the rest. People in general, everywhere, have a tendency to evade complications because it's something they are not ready for, but not every action taken by human beings are cautious, timid, or even digressive, because at some point something is gonna become boring and someone is gonna want to seek out more. That is the natural validation of "making a difference". If you don't have people casting doubts, it ain't making a difference enough
. Ironic enough, it's the OTT playstyle that only befit the potato rez/hz period that should long be cast aside as archaic and dated and digressive, while the nuanced, calculated and more expansive playstyles enabled by next gen tech that are supposed to be hailed as progressive, and celebrated by all, not just a sector, certainly in no way a niche. Anyone who was salty or angry that PUBG blew up, were simply in total rejection.
Why OW/PUBG/R6S/BFV killed themselves with esport push, was that management failed to realize early enough that a slower game can also be played fast, but a fast game cannot be the other way around.