Novideo_srgb vs Windows 11 ACM
Novideo_srgb vs Windows 11 ACM
As far as I understand it, both tools are using EDID to clamp the color gamut to sRGB. But the weird thing is that they both give different result, with ACM being slightly less saturated. How is this possible? And which one is more correct?
Re: Novideo_srgb vs Windows 11 ACM
No idea which one is more correct, but novideo configures the nvidia driver to do this, while in Windows 11 it's Windows itself that does it, so it doesn't surprise me they give different results.
Steam • GitHub • Stack Overflow
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts are my own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Blur Busters.
Re: Novideo_srgb vs Windows 11 ACM
Hmm. Well, Novideo normally doesn't affect gamma unless specifically enabled, but ACM does and uses sRGB curve. So I would guess that ACM is more accurate.