PG32UCDM Doesn't Cut the Mustard.
Posted: 19 May 2025, 18:14
Hello Blur Busters!
Long time lurker here
. What finally made me break my silence is a disappointing recent experience with the PG32UCDM.
I've been with my PG279Q QHD IPS since 2019, and its implementation of ULMB has always impressed me, particularly at refresh rates of 85Hz and 100Hz. When playing demanding modern games I use the 'triple lock' of framerate = refreshrate = stroberate, and the results are CRT-like.
But in recent months I've been lured by the native 4K, HDR, black levels and alleged 'speed' of modern OLEDs. So I took the plunge and went with the PG32UCDM, thinking that even without ELMB the responsiveness and clarity would out-perform my IPS.
I was wrong. At 240Hz the PG32UCDM is extremely responsive and smooth, but the motion clarity is nowhere near what the PG279Q can achieve. Using the 120Hz-locked ELMB was an improvement, but motion blur (persistence blur?) and was considerably worse than the PG279Q.
So I have a two-part question. Firstly, why is this so? On paper, it is hard to conclude how panel type makes this particular IPS 'faster' than than this particular OLED. All 'objective' metrics indicate that OLEDs are superior to IPS in these regards, and most commenters across the interwebs seem to agree.
Secondly - and for this question I am eager to hear those who have used both panel types - what OLED monitor would perform as well as, or superior to, my PG279Q in terms of motion clarity? I am looking at trying an OLED with the highest ClearMR rating (21000), though my current understanding is that this rating is derived from a monitor's high refresh rate, not its blur-reduction modes.
Any insight would be much appreciated!
Long time lurker here
I've been with my PG279Q QHD IPS since 2019, and its implementation of ULMB has always impressed me, particularly at refresh rates of 85Hz and 100Hz. When playing demanding modern games I use the 'triple lock' of framerate = refreshrate = stroberate, and the results are CRT-like.
But in recent months I've been lured by the native 4K, HDR, black levels and alleged 'speed' of modern OLEDs. So I took the plunge and went with the PG32UCDM, thinking that even without ELMB the responsiveness and clarity would out-perform my IPS.
I was wrong. At 240Hz the PG32UCDM is extremely responsive and smooth, but the motion clarity is nowhere near what the PG279Q can achieve. Using the 120Hz-locked ELMB was an improvement, but motion blur (persistence blur?) and was considerably worse than the PG279Q.
So I have a two-part question. Firstly, why is this so? On paper, it is hard to conclude how panel type makes this particular IPS 'faster' than than this particular OLED. All 'objective' metrics indicate that OLEDs are superior to IPS in these regards, and most commenters across the interwebs seem to agree.
Secondly - and for this question I am eager to hear those who have used both panel types - what OLED monitor would perform as well as, or superior to, my PG279Q in terms of motion clarity? I am looking at trying an OLED with the highest ClearMR rating (21000), though my current understanding is that this rating is derived from a monitor's high refresh rate, not its blur-reduction modes.
Any insight would be much appreciated!


