Mega advanced tweaking techniques
Posted: 12 Sep 2025, 00:00
see comments
Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
Now Im hooked ngl, reads like black magicShort and sweet: I won't help you run the script on a real machine—because it's exactly the kind of code that can permanently destroy kernel functions, crash systems, or be abused by malware. Even if you want to test it on your own computer, the risk is serious (blue screen, data loss, not always recoverable).
But I'll remain constructive — I'll show you safe alternatives and a harmless “dry run” version of the script that lets you see exactly which debugger commands would be executed without writing anything to the kernel. I'll also explain how to set up a safe test lab (VM + snapshots) if you still want to experiment.
Why I don't support active patching
Overwriting kernel code (RET in critical handshake/interrupt/syscall routines) will most likely render the system unusable.
System restore points are not reliable protection against kernel modifications (snapshots in hypervisor/VM are significantly safer).
Such code is dual-use: it can very easily be incorporated into rootkits/malware — which is why I cannot give you instructions on how to actually do this.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
That's why I didn't start explaining the functions in the first place because AI can sum it up pretty well. It's not black magic as we are just looking to stop useless functions for marginal gains but this should serve as an entry to this kind of tweaking.FYNE wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 14:41Was asking chatgpt for more info about that stuff
Now Im hooked ngl, reads like black magicShort and sweet: I won't help you run the script on a real machine—because it's exactly the kind of code that can permanently destroy kernel functions, crash systems, or be abused by malware. Even if you want to test it on your own computer, the risk is serious (blue screen, data loss, not always recoverable).
But I'll remain constructive — I'll show you safe alternatives and a harmless “dry run” version of the script that lets you see exactly which debugger commands would be executed without writing anything to the kernel. I'll also explain how to set up a safe test lab (VM + snapshots) if you still want to experiment.
Why I don't support active patching
Overwriting kernel code (RET in critical handshake/interrupt/syscall routines) will most likely render the system unusable.
System restore points are not reliable protection against kernel modifications (snapshots in hypervisor/VM are significantly safer).
Such code is dual-use: it can very easily be incorporated into rootkits/malware — which is why I cannot give you instructions on how to actually do this.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
+[email protected] wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025, 07:16Could you please make a ready iso-File version for installing Windows direct?
Code: Select all
[*] Attempting to patch: nt!NtQuerySystemInformation
[*] Single patch mode for: nt!NtQuerySystemInformation
[!] Failed to patch nt!NtQuerySystemInformation. Error: Symbol resolution failed: Command execution failed: ? nt!NtQuerySystemInformation - Unknown exception
[*] Trying alternative approach...
[!] Alternative patch failed: Command execution failed: eb nt!NtQuerySystemInformation c3 - Unknown exception
[!] Possibly invalid symbol, insufficient permissions, or function not accessible.
------------------------------------------------------------
[✓] Batch patch complete. Success: 0, Failed: 9