Blur Busters Forums

Looks good, actually. Although it does look like display latency is increased.

I love how fixing the AMA is somehow a feature now... kek

More lag? It looks like it's the same too me

I'm just curious how they accomplished to get rid of most of the ghosting/crosstalk. Is the screen on the right suppose to be a Xl2730 in normal refresh mode or strobing backlight mode?

Is "DyAc" simply turning on strobing backlight at 144 Hz which the Xl2730Z can already do? I don't fully understand their marketing.

To me it simply looks like they are comparing a XL2730 in normal refresh mode with a XL2735 in backlight strobe mode and giving it a name.

Until they fix all the stupid strobe bugs in the XL2730Z and actually improved upon, rather than having undid everything which made the XL2720Z such a great monitor (EVEN if this didn't happen until firmware V003/V004), I have no interest in it. Even if our VT tweaks were the result of exploiting a "bug" in the firmware....

Vega wrote:I'm just curious how they accomplished to get rid of most of the ghosting/crosstalk.

Standard 144hz. They fixed their shitty overdrive.

You can see how bad it has been here: http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2795

Vega wrote:I'm just curious how they accomplished to get rid of most of the ghosting/crosstalk.

I think one of the video of monitor is software edited.

There is inverse ghosting:

So basically the Xl2735 is a XL2730 with the bugs fixed? lol

Seems like the Eizo FS2735 would be the better option with IPS at strobed 144 Hz.

Vega wrote:So basically the Xl2735 is a XL2730 with the bugs fixed? lol

What bugs?

Vega wrote:Seems like the Eizo FS2735 would be the better option with IPS at strobed 144 Hz.

TN monitors like this is for competitive gaming (FPS).

TN vs IPS doesn't really matter that much when strobing.