Page 1 of 1

240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 29 Jul 2020, 05:41
by Kertwaii
Any suggestions for a 240hz monitor with least blur (doesn't matter with or without ULMB-like mode) + lowest latency?
Currently considering AOC AG251FG / FZ. There are some cheaper Acer-s but I heard they have a problem with frame skipping
Resolution and size doesn't really matter for me

Re: 240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 29 Jul 2020, 16:28
by senny22
Kertwaii wrote:
29 Jul 2020, 05:41
Any suggestions for a 240hz monitor with least blur (doesn't matter with or without ULMB-like mode) + lowest latency?
Currently considering AOC AG251FG / FZ. There are some cheaper Acer-s but I heard they have a problem with frame skipping
Resolution and size doesn't really matter for me
XF252QX or the more expensive Gsync variant. Or the BenQ XL2526S but that's quite expensive.

Re: 240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 29 Jul 2020, 17:02
by kofman13
acer XB273X

Re: 240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 03:57
by Conan
From what I can gather regarding various sources from individuals that knows their monitors.
XL2746S is by far the most superior monitor you're asking for. With some tweaking you're able to get really decent colors and it has by far best motion blur reduction technology with the lowest latency.
If 1080p for 27" wont be an issue and money is also not an issue. This is overall winner. Period.

Re: 240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 30 Jul 2020, 12:16
by Chief Blur Buster
For the AOC, the FG has less blur than the FZ due to the superior tuning.
However, those are very old models and generally won’t be the clearest 240Hz today.

Re: 240hz least blur+lowest latency?

Posted: 03 Aug 2020, 03:00
by Kertwaii
Thank you all for your replies! They brought me to rtings website that started reviewing monitors (it was only TVs at first, right?)

In the end I narrowed down the personal list of choices to 2 monitors:
ASUS VG279QM
HP Omen X 25f

Bought the HP one, because of downsides ASUS one has:
- 27'' yet resolution was still 1080p
- it's problems with "lower refresh rate - more ghosting" thing
- IPS
- more expensive here

Plus atleast according to rtings omen 25f has the least response time out of monitors they tested
280hz out of the box on VG279QM was very tempting but I decided to sacrifice it (considering that maybe omen can be overclocked?)