Dont know the model number.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3rvxIlvmE
From Acer!
Yep, Acer is turning into the leader slowly. (And Asus are turning into whiny bitches)
Although, i would wait for the IPS version.
Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
- masterotaku
- Posts: 436
- Joined: 20 Dec 2013, 04:01
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
One step closer to 3840x2160@120+Hz. And for the love of [insert favourite deity here], give us ULMB at low refresh rates. That high resolution is lost in movement!
CPU: Intel Core i7 7700K @ 4.9GHz
GPU: Gainward Phoenix 1080 GLH
RAM: GSkill Ripjaws Z 3866MHz CL19
Motherboard: Gigabyte Gaming M5 Z270
Monitor: Asus PG278QR
GPU: Gainward Phoenix 1080 GLH
RAM: GSkill Ripjaws Z 3866MHz CL19
Motherboard: Gigabyte Gaming M5 Z270
Monitor: Asus PG278QR
-
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: 26 Mar 2014, 07:23
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
50 to 100 (or 120-144 depending on panel speed) hz ULMB in 1 hz increments or bust.
I mean Benq did it...
I mean Benq did it...
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
Sensitive people dont want to see ANY flicker AT ALL.. at ANY refresh rate. I`m one of them.
Normal people dont mind it if the refresh is high enough. Thats why you never see ULMB below 85hz or 100hz sometimes.
Its a minority actually who have a skull so thick they wouldnt mind the flicker @ 30hz.
Normal people dont mind it if the refresh is high enough. Thats why you never see ULMB below 85hz or 100hz sometimes.
Its a minority actually who have a skull so thick they wouldnt mind the flicker @ 30hz.
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
Then turn off the ULMB.Edmond wrote:Sensitive people dont want to see ANY flicker AT ALL.. at ANY refresh rate. I`m one of them.
Normal people dont mind it if the refresh is high enough. Thats why you never see ULMB below 85hz or 100hz sometimes.
Its a minority actually who have a skull so thick they wouldnt mind the flicker @ 30hz.
Rabidz7 is a: PowerPC Fan, LCD and x86 Hater, and a Plasma/OLED/CRT/SED/FED Lover
-
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: 26 Mar 2014, 07:23
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
Edmond you're getting very close to a ban with the persistent flaming. Keep the name calling to a minimum. If you don't like flicker then don't use it. Some of us grew up with 50-60hz flickering TV's and didn't bat an eye.
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
Okok, im sorry. I dont know why my dick is so small.Falkentyne wrote:Edmond you're getting very close to a ban with the persistent flaming. Keep the name calling to a minimum. If you don't like flicker then don't use it. Some of us grew up with 50-60hz flickering TV's and didn't bat an eye.
Still hate flicker tho. Black frame insertion or ULMB i actually dont mind. Its the flicker of low quality screens that has no benefits even, that i cant stand.
Re: Acer ? = 3840x2160 TN @ 75hz
60hz flicker is not a problem when you are used to it.
Shit, when you are used to and can deal with 480i flicker,everything else is a piece of cake.
It's like flyback 15khz whine with just about every CRT. You get used to it.
I use a CRT regularly for old consoles and aside from my consumer set having some issues(Frequent magnetization,blooming,trails on fast Dark to Light/Light to Dark transitions), 60hz motion is amazingly smooth and nearly perfect.
30hz flickering on the other hand WOULD be unusable
I'd kill for a sub 90hz 4k ULMB monitor.
Plus there is always the part where it's adjustable. Use a lower level. Still get some blur reduction.
Shit, when you are used to and can deal with 480i flicker,everything else is a piece of cake.
It's like flyback 15khz whine with just about every CRT. You get used to it.
I use a CRT regularly for old consoles and aside from my consumer set having some issues(Frequent magnetization,blooming,trails on fast Dark to Light/Light to Dark transitions), 60hz motion is amazingly smooth and nearly perfect.
30hz flickering on the other hand WOULD be unusable
I'd kill for a sub 90hz 4k ULMB monitor.
Plus there is always the part where it's adjustable. Use a lower level. Still get some blur reduction.