Fine, then:
Not glossy or matte, but it absorbs all light that falls onto the display. Happy?
Search found 3 matches
- 17 Oct 2014, 20:37
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: Theoretically best display... what u think?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 15420
- 10 Oct 2014, 22:09
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: Theoretically best display... what u think?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 15420
Re: Theoretically best display... what u think?
To me, the best display would have a
resolution of 28000 x 14000
framerate of 600 with low persistence
any size larger than 70cm but smaller than 100cm
RGBCYMVOW pixel structure (nine subpixels per pixel)
Quantum dots or UV laser projection onto phosphors/color laser onto diffuser
glossy
under 2cm ...
resolution of 28000 x 14000
framerate of 600 with low persistence
any size larger than 70cm but smaller than 100cm
RGBCYMVOW pixel structure (nine subpixels per pixel)
Quantum dots or UV laser projection onto phosphors/color laser onto diffuser
glossy
under 2cm ...
- 22 Sep 2014, 18:32
- Forum: Area 51: Display Science, Research & Engineering
- Topic: Considering producing SED/FED monitors... Critique needed
- Replies: 46
- Views: 114211
Re: Considering producing SED/FED monitors... Critique neede
If these monitors did exist, I'd pay up to 2399 dollars for one (at least 150Hz, 2560x1600, 60cm.)
I support entirely the production of SED/FED.
The previous attempt at producing SED/FED were stopped by patent trolls, watch out.
Please excuse my english.
I support entirely the production of SED/FED.
The previous attempt at producing SED/FED were stopped by patent trolls, watch out.
Please excuse my english.
