Well yes but no. See my thread about 720p 1080hz oled. You want 1 pixel of blur per frame at all speeds.
Ideally, you don't want any pixel of motion blur. But 1 pixel is the "good enough" standard where you don't really need anymore. It's really literally 0.5 pixels of blur at leading edge and 0.5 ...
Search found 11856 matches
- 22 Oct 2025, 01:54
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: ViewSonic XG2431 Discussion Thread [Blur Busters Approved XG2431 - 24" 240Hz IPS with Best Strobing]
- Replies: 1429
- Views: 1601139
- 22 Oct 2025, 01:50
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: ViewSonic XG2431 Discussion Thread [Blur Busters Approved XG2431 - 24" 240Hz IPS with Best Strobing]
- Replies: 1429
- Views: 1601139
Re: ViewSonic XG2431 Discussion Thread [Blur Busters Approved XG2431 - 24" 240Hz IPS with Best Strobing]
From various posts and articles, the Chief always emphasized 1px of motion blur at 1000 px per second motion as the gold standard. That's what I'm assuming as his benchmark for perfect clarity.
It's a scientific formula, not a gold standard.
The gold standard is 0 pixels.
If you have 0.1ms MPRT ...
- 21 Oct 2025, 19:56
- Forum: High Frame Rate Video (HFR, UltraHFR, 120fps, 240fps, 1000fps)
- Topic: 4K 1000HZ+ already feasible in 2025?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13156
Re: 4K 1000HZ+ already feasible in 2025?
Personally I wouldn't worry about it because:
-Even with OLED you aleady have some of these kind of luddite articles and people who just like to complain technological improvements for no reason whatsoever
That's the UFO's job to worry about. As a honorary Hz mythbuster it's something I cannot ...
-Even with OLED you aleady have some of these kind of luddite articles and people who just like to complain technological improvements for no reason whatsoever
That's the UFO's job to worry about. As a honorary Hz mythbuster it's something I cannot ...
- 17 Oct 2025, 13:55
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: Not sensitive to sample and hold blur.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1256
Re: Not sensitive to sample and hold blur.
If I were honest the difference with using crt beam in retroarch is subtle . Placebo? Cos when I use my monitors strobing at 120, ufo persistence test, shows the diff clearly. Am I not using the right parameters? I recently got prescription glasses. Also would it be more obvious on a 240hz ...
- 12 Oct 2025, 16:39
- Forum: Eliminating Motion Blur — BFI / ULMB / ELMB / DyAc / framegen / LSS / etc
- Topic: ViewSonic Strobe Utility tool: no custom profiles?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 992
Re: ViewSonic Strobe Utility tool: no custom profiles?
Create a profile's name for "Custom" of PureXP+ is REQUIRED!
It's a very good idea.
It would have to happen at some future date (sometime well into 2026).
It is currently being evaluated that a generic version of Strobe Utility may be open sourced.
Blur Busters are focussing on other ...
- 09 Oct 2025, 21:08
- Forum: Eliminating Motion Blur — BFI / ULMB / ELMB / DyAc / framegen / LSS / etc
- Topic: ViewSonic Strobe Utility tool: no custom profiles?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 992
Re: ViewSonic Strobe Utility tool: no custom profiles?
Hello. I tested 150Hz BFI-HW for 50Hz + BFI-SW ("120-safe-BFI" shader at sub-frames 3) by ShaderGlass for watch live TV@50Hz signal or any 50fps video and I get no any burn-in issue. I adore ViewSonic XG2431!! <3 :mrgreen:
But does "ViewSonic Strobe Utility" tool not have any "Custom" (PureXP ...
- 07 Oct 2025, 14:53
- Forum: High Frame Rate Video (HFR, UltraHFR, 120fps, 240fps, 1000fps)
- Topic: 4K 1000HZ+ already feasible in 2025?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 13156
Re: 4K 1000HZ+ already feasible in 2025?
Yes, but I'm worried about the optics (reputation)
- First 1000 Hz LCD comes out
- It's not one of these faster LCDs
- The GtG is still big part of refreshtime
- The predictable news articles about 1000Hz not being human-visible to eyes (without knowing nuanced context such as geometrics AND GtG=0)
- First 1000 Hz LCD comes out
- It's not one of these faster LCDs
- The GtG is still big part of refreshtime
- The predictable news articles about 1000Hz not being human-visible to eyes (without knowing nuanced context such as geometrics AND GtG=0)
- 06 Oct 2025, 17:26
- Forum: Forum System / Registration / Suggestions
- Topic: Registration Problems? Blocked? Email Me For Support!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 110476
Re: Registration Problems? Blocked? Email Me For Support!
Is anyone else getting 403 Forbidden errors when trying to post in certain threads? For me it's the Retrotink one in the OLED folder.
https://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?t=12342&start=60
Hopefully Fixed
The spambot filter settings were too aggressive and it was falsing on some stuff ...
- 06 Oct 2025, 15:22
- Forum: General — Displays, Graphics & More
- Topic: Image artifacts for BFI frequency != content frequency
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1211
Re: Image artifacts for BFI frequency != content frequency
I know about the double image effect when running 120 Hz BFI over 60 Hz content. What is if the BFI runs at any other frequency other than exactly 2 times the content frequency, like for example 62 Hz or 75 Hz where the division of both frequencies does not result in a natural number?
Here's the ...
Here's the ...
- 30 Sep 2025, 01:15
- Forum: Area 51: Display Science, Research & Engineering
- Topic: Line by Line Display vs Frame Display
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1786
Re: Line by Line Display vs Frame Display
It is entirely possible to flip the pixels line by line as the data comes in (similar to the analog signal in CRTs)
That's correct, and that's what many LCD/OLED displays already do ( high speed videos ).
What i meant by dividing the screen into 4 buffers you wouldn’t take a 60hz signal and send ...
That's correct, and that's what many LCD/OLED displays already do ( high speed videos ).
What i meant by dividing the screen into 4 buffers you wouldn’t take a 60hz signal and send ...
