Is there any reason why you chose gpu scaling instead of display?
Oh my, thats very saturated, FPS mode + digial vibrance.
FPS mode has trash contrast, but its nice for gaming, helps like shadow boost.
Is there any reason why you chose gpu scaling instead of display?
Oh my, thats very saturated, FPS mode + digial vibrance.
I've seen much worse blacks than this panel. This is actually pretty good for an IPS panel. I've been using VA panel for the last couple of years and naturally I can see the contrast difference but blacks doesn't look bad at all. I didn't even expect this panel to be this good, especially with blacks.
Forgot to add my shadow boost is lv2Discorz wrote: ↑28 Apr 2021, 08:04Is there any reason why you chose gpu scaling instead of display?
Oh I always had this option on GPU on my old monitor, but haven’t bother to test it on display, will do it when I get home.
Oh my, thats very saturated, FPS mode + digial vibrance.
FPS mode has trash contrast, but its nice for gaming, helps like shadow boost.
Tried adding you to send you a PM, but that proved to be difficult.speancer wrote: ↑15 Apr 2021, 14:30Thank you
OD120 is the best for 280 Hz in my opinion. It's an overdrive level hidden in factory menu for some reason, even though it works the best for this monitor. Despite its name, OD120 is a middle ground between OD60 and OD80. OD120 provides good response time with less overshoot than OD80. First page of this thread explains how to enable OD120. I agree with Max_hz that OD80 is totally usable for CSGO as well, although you might notice overshoot.
Yes, pretty happy with VG259QM in CSGO. I chose it over XL2546K. If you ask me, there is very little reason to still use TN nowadays, IPS panels have gone a long way.decide wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 14:36Anyway, seeing as you've been through a rather big pool of monitors; are you happy (like, really happy) with the performance in CSGO? I've been, particularly, looking at the XL2546K vs the VG248QM and I, more or less, only play CSGO (at the moment), but I also use my computer for both work and some photo editing. Been using TN-panels as long as I can remember, and I currently have the VG248QE (yes, still), which works good for CSGO (and other FPS games).
I see that VG248QE is already a few-year-old-monitor with just 144 Hz refresh rate, so VG259QM will outperform it easily, and you should definitely see a difference, in a good way, in terms of motion clarity. There is a noticeable difference between 144 Hz and 280 Hz in pure motion clarity, it's best shown in this UFO Test, and VG259QM achieves even 1.9 ms GTG average response time on OD80 with (for me) still acceptable overshoot, while OD120 delivers 2.6 ms GTG average response time with much less overshoot, so these results are really good.decide wrote: ↑08 May 2021, 14:36The question really comes down to if I would perceive VG259QE and it's IPS panel as a downgrade in CSGO compared to what I'm currently using. I'm not sure if I could justify buying it if it is. And yes, I will live with whatever settings are required for the best performance in game.