I lost the screenshots but a guy on Discord tested these and concluded the default Intel controller to be superior to other USB controllers with ASMedia winning in a few tests that are not relevant in realtime use.
evaluating xhci usb controller performance
Re: evaluating xhci usb controller performance
Re: evaluating xhci usb controller performance
I assume you're referring to https://twitter.com/BEYONDPERF_LLG/stat ... 04789956#m
The sample size (n=1) is too small.
The tester didn't provide repeatable steps to replicate his testing environment and thus allow others to contribute with their own hardware & OS to make up a larger sample size and give concrete conclusions.
His HW choices for the MXA tests are also not mentioned.
I do value his data, however. It's definitely something interesting to explore, as DPC/ISR driver performance is one of the most important parts in the journey of minimising CPU overhead from drivers (decreasing jitter).
I'm not sure what you refer to as “in realtime use”, as everyone seems to have their own definition of it
Last edited by kyube on 04 Sep 2025, 11:40, edited 1 time in total.
evaluating xhci controller performance | audio latency discussion thread | "Why is LatencyMon not desirable to objectively measure DPC/ISR driver performance" | AM4 / AM5 system tuning considerations | latency-oriented HW considerations | “xhci hand-off” setting considerations | #1 tip for electricity-related topics | ESPORTS: Latency Perception, Temporal Ventriloquism & Horizon of Simultaneity
Re: evaluating xhci usb controller performance
Nothing technical, just general computer use and gaming.kyube wrote: ↑04 Sep 2025, 08:58I assume you're referring to https://twitter.com/BEYONDPERF_LLG/stat ... 04789956#m
The sample size (n=1) is too small.
The tester didn't provide repeatable steps to replicate his testing environment and thus allow others to contribute with their own hardware & OS to make up a larger sample size and give concrete conclusions.
His HW choices for the MXA tests are also not mentioned.
I do value his data, however. It's definitely something interesting to explore, as DPC/ISR driver performance is one of the most parts in the journey of minimising CPU overhead from drivers (decreasing jitter).
I'm not sure what you refer to as “in realtime use”, as everyone seems to have their own definition of it![]()
Re: evaluating xhci usb controller performance
By the way, USB controllers can have their firmware updated.
I often do not clearly state my thoughts. google translate is far from perfect. And in addition to the translator, I myself am mistaken. Do not take me seriously.
Re: evaluating xhci usb controller performance
Yes, but not all PCIe AIC's have the ability to be updated using that particular application software.
They can brick the card
Off-topic: I've recently acquired 2 more AICs with these specific USB XHCI host controllers: Etron EJ168 & TUSB7340
I'll likely also acquire a TB3 (JHL7540) or TB4 (JHL8540) controller AIC.
I'd say that I have every 3rd party vendor USB 3.0 XHCI host controller available to the market for the past decade
I might skip USB 2.0 AICs due to the inability to run +1kHz on them without disabling IMOD.
My plan is to expand the testing data extensively on my opening post, using better ways to visualize the data.
No ETA.
evaluating xhci controller performance | audio latency discussion thread | "Why is LatencyMon not desirable to objectively measure DPC/ISR driver performance" | AM4 / AM5 system tuning considerations | latency-oriented HW considerations | “xhci hand-off” setting considerations | #1 tip for electricity-related topics | ESPORTS: Latency Perception, Temporal Ventriloquism & Horizon of Simultaneity
