flood's input lag measurements

Everything about latency. This section is mainly user/consumer discussion. (Peer-reviewed scientific discussion should go in Laboratory section). Tips, mouse lag, display lag, game engine lag, network lag, whole input lag chain, VSYNC OFF vs VSYNC ON, and more! Input Lag Articles on Blur Busters.
Sparky
Posts: 682
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 02:29

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by Sparky » 01 Apr 2015, 05:07

Light to dark transitions are a lot harder, I'm lucky to get within 500 microseconds.

Edit: Interestingly, the 20microsecond pulse of light is visible to the eye, but the 500 microsecond pulse of darkness is not.

stirner
Posts: 74
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 04:55

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by stirner » 01 Apr 2015, 08:22

That's persistence. Ignoring phosphor persistence, we stop noticing non-illuminated phases at about 80Hz, i. e. 12.5ms.

spacediver
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 23:51

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by spacediver » 01 Apr 2015, 12:57

Detecting a single pulse of darkness requires the ability to temporally sample the visual field with a precision that meets or exceeds the duration of that pulse. Look up flicker fusion thresholds, and temporal integration/summation. Since a detector, such as a photoreceptor in the retina, responds to light, and not to darkness, being able to detect a single pulse of darkness means being able to distinguish, in time, two temporally separate light events. The whole system has to be able to (neurally) encode those two events as distinct, rather than sum them together.

Detecting a single pulse of light only requires the ability to encode a single event, and that is limited by luminance, or contrast thresholds. If the single pulse of light was bright enough, you could detect a pulse that was one nanosecond long.

Sparky
Posts: 682
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 02:29

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by Sparky » 01 Apr 2015, 16:03

stirner wrote:That's persistence. Ignoring phosphor persistence, we stop noticing non-illuminated phases at about 80Hz, i. e. 12.5ms.
I know, I'm talking about 0.5ms pulses at 1hz. I think it's just down to the eye being less sensitive to changes in brightness of something that's already bright.

flood
Posts: 929
Joined: 21 Dec 2013, 01:25

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by flood » 01 Apr 2015, 17:15

Sparky wrote:Wikipedia says it takes several milliseconds for a photoresistor to detect, but that's just saturation, you start to see the change immediately. Using a photoresistor, a pot, and a LED, I was able to get down to the noise (<20 microseconds ) between turning a LED on and detecting it with the photoresistor(just adjusting the threshold).
yea but i want to be able to detect the light fron a single line from my crt, which is way dimmer than an led

flood
Posts: 929
Joined: 21 Dec 2013, 01:25

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by flood » 05 Apr 2015, 20:23

just ordered more crap from digikey in hopes of improving the performance further. gunna try a battery pack as well to see how much noise is related to usb power.

also hilarious discussion on ocn:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1546025/skyl ... -cursor/30

Sparky
Posts: 682
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 02:29

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by Sparky » 05 Apr 2015, 21:28

flood wrote:just ordered more crap from digikey in hopes of improving the performance further. gunna try a battery pack as well to see how much noise is related to usb power.

also hilarious discussion on ocn:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1546025/skyl ... -cursor/30
I saw that thread, and stepped in it. Now I need to find a hose.

As for noise, Wouldn't being hooked up to USB for data make that a moot point? I'd try sticking a big cap on your power rail first.

flood
Posts: 929
Joined: 21 Dec 2013, 01:25

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by flood » 05 Apr 2015, 21:34

yea that'd work too but i also want to reverse bias the photodiode

Sparky
Posts: 682
Joined: 15 Jan 2014, 02:29

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by Sparky » 05 Apr 2015, 22:45

I just read some more of that thread...I'm dying of laughter.

"But it's not a mouse!!!" :lol:

Black Octagon
Posts: 216
Joined: 18 Dec 2013, 03:41

Re: flood's input lag measurements

Post by Black Octagon » 06 Apr 2015, 05:13

My world would be much better if I could put the entirety of OCN on ignore. Never understood why people continue to post there.

Post Reply