Downside: it only comes out in August
![Razz :-P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
(Btw, 1440p @ 24" has very high pixel density. The effective resolution is exactly the same as a 4K @ 36".)
Hmm. This seems more like a marketing gimmick - probably the same panel as in the other 24.5" 240Hz monitors. According to http://aoc-europe.com/en/products/pdf/a ... europe.com, screen width is 543mm and pixel is 0.28, so 1980 pixels. Moreover, the recommended resolution for 240Hz is 1980x1080.RealNC wrote:AOC just announced a 24" 240Hz G-Sync 1440p monitor (AGON AG251FG). Since it's G-Sync, it most probably uses ULMB. Although I can't find any info if it allows ULMB all the way up to 240Hz.
Downside: it only comes out in August
(Btw, 1440p @ 24" has very high pixel density. The effective resolution is exactly the same as a 4K @ 36".)
ULMB will generally max out at 144Hz for a 240Hz TN monitor.RealNC wrote:AOC just announced a 24" 240Hz G-Sync 1440p monitor (AGON AG251FG). Since it's G-Sync, it most probably uses ULMB. Although I can't find any info if it allows ULMB all the way up to 240Hz.
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Yes, interesting, if it was a native 1440p monitor. But if it is just a native 1080p, why would I want to choose 1440p for desktop? Making it look like it is a native 2560x1440 monitor while it isn't (at least very likely, as I pointed out in my previous post) is just a new low in how manufactures advertise their products (http://aoc-europe.com/en/products/ag251fg).Chief Blur Buster wrote:RealNC wrote: I noticed you might not be able to have the cake and eat it too: You have to choose 2560x1440 (144Hz) or 1920x1080 (240Hz). But that's an interesting choice -- desktop 1440p and gaming 1080p.
So this is an outdated article?Haste wrote:- Overdrive does not add input lag.
So the XL2540/46 can do strobed 144Hz that's mostly 'strobe-crosstalk' free? And it can go as high as 182Hz strobed but there's more 'strobe-crosstalk'? Did I get that right?Chief Blur Buster wrote:Short answer: No.andimoon wrote:Is the XL2720 with the new software superior to the XL2540?
Long answer: Via equivalent adjustments (via monitor menus instead of via strobe utility) -- the XL2540 is able to create a mostly strobe-crosstalk-free 144Hz mode on the XL2540, while you cannot do that on any of the -11, -20, -30, or -35 suffixed monitors from BenQ/Zowie. This is because the XL2540 and XL2546 are both capable of even larger vertical totals than the monitors supported by Strobe Utility. However, instead of using Strobe Utility, you adjust via the monitor menus.