A Solid lad wrote:giubox360 wrote:@a solid lad could you try also our program to see all the data together please?
Yes, I will.
k2viper, can you post a screenshot about your options sreen for Latencymon?
...and also, do you guys have the paging file disabled? (I do...)
No I didn't, here you can find the lowest digit with LG 240 hz with 1 ms MBR activated and VT 1304
Stats are the same both for samsung 144 hz and LG but the Samsung sits like....almoust always from 5 to 10 ms.
Both seems to run between 3 and 30 ms most of the time the LG around 20, but the samsung around 5/10 ms.
For this reason I don't know if it's true the current value or the average values in STATS, as result the monitor seems pretty fast.
(average STATS are the same for the two monitors, but not the "current measure" as I explained before. )
https://ibb.co/nQP85S
https://ibb.co/hjkeen
I have black tuner: 75
luminance 100
contrast: 63
sharpness: 50
response time: faster
MBR activated.
The only bad thing is the lowest part of the screen where crosstalk is not great, center better, but not perfect something like the other Asus or acer panel I guess . I'm really curious also to see the Benq XL2546 or the Dell freesync 240 hz @a solid lad tested.
p.s.
Dunno why VT1304 made my contrast higher and blacks deeper, I like this thing.