ONLY for competitive play, please answer !

Everything about displays and monitors. 120Hz, 144Hz, 240Hz, 4K, 1440p, input lag, display shopping, monitor purchase decisions, compare, versus, debate, and more. Questions? Just ask!
Notty_PT
Posts: 552
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 02:50

Re: ONLY for competitive play, please answer !

Post by Notty_PT » 30 Apr 2019, 23:24

1000WATT wrote:Notty_PT
Have you tried changing 24.5 to 23? It saves my eyes in fps games on a 27 inch monitor. 27 - 24.5. (2560x1440 - 2330x1310).
Is it really so important to have 1920x1080?
Yes I did that, but using a non native resolution without any full screen scaling (black bars around the image) will add input lag! So that´s a no go to me

pox02
Posts: 262
Joined: 28 Sep 2018, 06:04

Re: ONLY for competitive play, please answer !

Post by pox02 » 01 May 2019, 05:19

‎ Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1‎
‎ Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)‎
‎ Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray),0.5ms (Gray to Gray, Min) now make sense why xg258q faster then 248q
monitors xg258q aw2518hf 27GK750F-B pg248q xg240r lg w2363d-pf xb270hu XL2546 XL2546K NXG252R

Notty_PT
Posts: 552
Joined: 09 Aug 2017, 02:50

Re: ONLY for competitive play, please answer !

Post by Notty_PT » 01 May 2019, 11:19

pox02 wrote:‎ Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1‎
‎ Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)‎
‎ Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray),0.5ms (Gray to Gray, Min) now make sense why xg258q faster then 248q
Where did you see that? Afaik they are both rated as 1ms. And tbh I don´t find the XG25 faster response time wise compared to XG24! My XG24 has faster overdrive and less artifacts. Is just the bad coating and higher input lag than the XG25. Did you try already to put them side by side with "Extended" on Windows desktop and drag the mouse around?

pox02
Posts: 262
Joined: 28 Sep 2018, 06:04

Re: ONLY for competitive play, please answer !

Post by pox02 » 01 May 2019, 11:53

Notty_PT wrote:
pox02 wrote:‎ Contrast Ratio (Max) : 1000:1‎
‎ Viewing Angle (CR≧10) : 170°(H)/160°(V)‎
‎ Response Time : 1ms (Gray to Gray),0.5ms (Gray to Gray, Min) now make sense why xg258q faster then 248q
Where did you see that? Afaik they are both rated as 1ms. And tbh I don´t find the XG25 faster response time wise compared to XG24! My XG24 has faster overdrive and less artifacts. Is just the bad coating and higher input lag than the XG25. Did you try already to put them side by side with "Extended" on Windows desktop and drag the mouse around?
https://www.asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-St ... fications/

https://www.asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-St ... fications/

check both display specifications yes xg25 faster then xg248 but i take it everyday then 248 xg25 have same overdrive as 248 and i couldn't see any difference could be im not sensitive but xg25 feels a lot faster then 248
monitors xg258q aw2518hf 27GK750F-B pg248q xg240r lg w2363d-pf xb270hu XL2546 XL2546K NXG252R

Post Reply