When I got an overview over the market I saw dozens of potential candidates, until I ordered some for evaluation...
- HDR or wide-gamut means that for 99% of content (the one in standard gamut) you lose all monitor adjustments, especially gamma, but sometimes brightness as well. The BenQ EW277HDR was so far my favourite option, until I tried the Rec. 709 in a dark room and it showed atrocious banding between black and other colours with no way to fix the issue.
- High refresh FreeSync: Typically the overdrive is statically optimized for the highest refresh and if you are a good bit below that with your FPS, motion leaves bright overshoot artefacts. On the other hand a fixed 240 Hz refresh rate can mitigate the need for FreeSync/VSync. GSync is more well thought out, hands down, but I'm on AMD and GSync modules cost as much as an office monitor.
https://xsreviews.co.uk/reviews/benq-ew ... ll-trades/
https://playwares.com/dpreview/50043618
Maybe the Samsung C27RG50 is a better choice. It looks like a bad default gamma setting may be holding it back from being very accurate: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sa ... -monitor/3
The reviewer writes: "The second chart shows results after tweaking the RGB sliders and changing the gamma preset from 1 to 3. This brought everything in line. The grayscale error became very low, and gamma rides slightly above the ideal 2.2 line. [...] Our sample looked really good after its grayscale calibration and gamma adjustment."
I guess I'll have to ask him if that "calibration" means creating an ICC profile or is just monitor settings alone.
Are there any other accurate sRGB VA monitors to look into?

