XG2431 and XL2411P has an adjustable strobe phase, but XG270 does not.
That can affect strobe lag, depending on where you place the Leo Bodnar (top, center, bottom)
You cannot extrapolate an unadjustable-strobe-phase monitor to an adjustable-strobe-phase monitor. I can only compare XG2431 and XL2411p reliably generically from strobe phase mathematics.Angel Soler wrote: ↑28 May 2022, 12:05So I thought that the results could be extrapolated to the XL2411p and, therefore, since the XL2411p and the XG2431 are very similar, we would then have an approximate measurement for the XG2431.
The VSYNC ON 60Hz strobe lag differential can be RANDOM(0…1/60sec) for a random unadjustable-strobe-phase monitor, depending on how its strobe tuning is done.
5ms is within the range, but it could just as easily be 0ms or 16ms for a random given monitor that does not have a Strobe Utility to adjust your latency-vs-strobe-phase tradeoff.
XG2431 and XL2411p is two different species of apples because they both behave similarity on scanout velocity, large vertical totals, and both use the same generic industry standard strobe tuning methodology, and thus is easily mathematically latency mappable to each other at identical settings. But XG270 does not have a Strobe Utility, and it’s also a fixed-horizontal-scanrate panel (XL2411P and XG2431 are both variable horizontal scanrate) so it’s comparing apples vs oranges in latency, as the panel behaves differently — even if lag number is identical for one benchmark, lag number can be very different because of the differences in adjustability or differences in fixed/variable scanout velocity capability.
Don’t forget Leo Bodnar (a 1080p 60Hz VSYNC ON lag tester) can display 3 different lag numbers depending on which flashing square you put the Leo Bodnar sensor on. Most reviewers use the center, though.
I will move these posts to a new thread if there are further questions, since this starts getting offtopic from the POV of XG2431 thread.