Re: Does Dyac2 still pose potential harm to the eyes?
Posted: 20 Mar 2025, 11:13
Both the XG2431 and XL2566K heavily outperform CRT displays in terms of MPRT (total motion clarity)Espionage724 wrote: ↑18 Mar 2025, 17:31Dyac sounds gross:
Why would anyone want dynamic anything especially when it comes to the images displayed to the screen? It's either fast-as-possible-at-all-times, or there's intentional latency added as a feature. I can totally see Dyac causing eye strain due to your brain expecting consistency, and not frames delivered at the potential speed of an algorithm.DyAc/DyAc⁺/DyAc 2 is designed to reduce motion blur in LCD displays. “DyAc”, which is short for Dynamic Accuracy, reduces ghosting in fast game scenes, minimizes screen shaking in rapid firing, and enables players to track enemies more easily.
Funny how none of these modern marketing tricks come close to a basic CRT
This is without going into the topic of geometry issues, text rendering issues, physical dimensions, ambient temperature difference, lack of RAMDAC on modern GPUS (thus forced to live with added total latency) and emitted magnetic field which the modern CRT experience suffers from.