Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
Congrats on the new monitor! I didn´t buy one myself because it simply doesn´t exist on Europe, so that´s why I never talked about it. Plus, every MSI monitor I tried had always higher input lag than desirable. Same with their motherboards always having higher DPC latencies (even tho I´m using one right now). So is not a brand that excites me a lot. WIth that being said, when the monitor launches on Europe I will for sure try one.Azure-XIII wrote:
GPW affected by this?Notty_PT wrote:Congrats on the new monitor! I didn´t buy one myself because it simply doesn´t exist on Europe, so that´s why I never talked about it. Plus, every MSI monitor I tried had always higher input lag than desirable. Same with their motherboards always having higher DPC latencies (even tho I´m using one right now). So is not a brand that excites me a lot. WIth that being said, when the monitor launches on Europe I will for sure try one.Azure-XIII wrote:
Also I noticed on your image that you are using an wireless mouse. Let me advise you that wireless on 240hz is very bad, because In wireless mode Logitech mice skip a report roughly every 1000 ms, wich isn´t that noticebale on 144hz, but it is on 240hz. This is mouse tester graph showing that:
1000WATT wrote:Weight 67grams (Matte) and 68 grams (Glossy)
because of her weight, do you like it so much?
Defo yes! Every wireless mice by Logitech is affected by this. Altho be prepared because 99% of the internet will tell you wireless mice are as good as wired one and that there is no difference at alldogroll wrote:GPW affected by this?Notty_PT wrote:Congrats on the new monitor! I didn´t buy one myself because it simply doesn´t exist on Europe, so that´s why I never talked about it. Plus, every MSI monitor I tried had always higher input lag than desirable. Same with their motherboards always having higher DPC latencies (even tho I´m using one right now). So is not a brand that excites me a lot. WIth that being said, when the monitor launches on Europe I will for sure try one.Azure-XIII wrote:
Also I noticed on your image that you are using an wireless mouse. Let me advise you that wireless on 240hz is very bad, because In wireless mode Logitech mice skip a report roughly every 1000 ms, wich isn´t that noticebale on 144hz, but it is on 240hz. This is mouse tester graph showing that:
You literally post a graph with no sources and claim it as fact. If this was a real huge issue more people would be talking about it and RJN wouldn't have even put the GPW as the #1 mouse in his top 40. How your hardware behaves has a lot to do with your environment ie other wireless signals, as well as your own hardware and respective software installed can all have negative effects on how your input devices behave. You're claiming to notice a difference at 240hz where a mouse updating at 1000 times per second and misses ONE report every second out of 1000 reports per second as a problem? What are you superhuman or just drinking some special juice?Notty_PT wrote:1000WATT wrote:Weight 67grams (Matte) and 68 grams (Glossy)
because of her weight, do you like it so much?
Lightweight, buttons, feet/glide, sensor implementation, software (not intrusive, light), separate buttons from shell, wheel. It´s a masterpiece. But long mice do not fit my hand well, altho I am having great accuracy with it, and altho sometimes I feel uncomfortable because of the lenght, I´m still doing well wich I guess is what matters the most. Now I am excited for CoolerMaster MM710 wich will be even lighter and has a more fingertip friendly shape.
Defo yes! Every wireless mice by Logitech is affected by this. Altho be prepared because 99% of the internet will tell you wireless mice are as good as wired one and that there is no difference at alldogroll wrote:GPW affected by this?Notty_PT wrote:Congrats on the new monitor! I didn´t buy one myself because it simply doesn´t exist on Europe, so that´s why I never talked about it. Plus, every MSI monitor I tried had always higher input lag than desirable. Same with their motherboards always having higher DPC latencies (even tho I´m using one right now). So is not a brand that excites me a lot. WIth that being said, when the monitor launches on Europe I will for sure try one.Azure-XIII wrote:
Also I noticed on your image that you are using an wireless mouse. Let me advise you that wireless on 240hz is very bad, because In wireless mode Logitech mice skip a report roughly every 1000 ms, wich isn´t that noticebale on 144hz, but it is on 240hz. This is mouse tester graph showing that:
This.Malinkadink wrote:You literally post a graph with no sources and claim it as fact. If this was a real huge issue more people would be talking about it and RJN wouldn't have even put the GPW as the #1 mouse in his top 40. How your hardware behaves has a lot to do with your environment ie other wireless signals, as well as your own hardware and respective software installed can all have negative effects on how your input devices behave. You're claiming to notice a difference at 240hz where a mouse updating at 1000 times per second and misses ONE report every second out of 1000 reports per second as a problem? What are you superhuman or just drinking some special juice?
FYI I have a GPW and its the best mouse i've ever had, 80g and 60 hours of battery life i will never go back to anything with a cord. Logitech makes some of the best sensors on the market and invested a ridiculous amount of R&D into the development of this mouse, and it shows. I still compete with the best of the best in Overwatch so moving from a wired Deathadder to this mouse did not affect me negatively in the slightest.
why do you need a source if you can check it yourself?Malinkadink wrote: You literally post a graph with no sources and claim it as fact.