Re: NVIDIA G-Sync Pulsar monitor - Asus ROG Strix XG27AQNGV
Posted: 23 Jan 2026, 18:18
How does pulsar look like with 2x framegen on a 60 or 30 fps game?
Who you gonna call? The Blur Busters! For Everything Better Than 60Hz™
https://forums.blurbusters.com/
hopefully asus makes a 600-750hz monitor with ulmb2 on a TN, and if it was 1440p 24 inch, it might be peak gamingliquidshadowfox wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 13:05I can confirm
1. Pulsar keeps pulsing 360 hz if you have vsync off and are rendering more than 360 hz
2. If it dips from above 360 to below 360 the transition is smooth with no visible flicker to my eye
For #3, there was a review that compared the 2 and said the 540 hz ULMB 2 looks clearer but this more crosstalk than pulsar
Can you explain what you mean with "HW:Legacy Flip"?
Pulsar looks good in some games when you use frame gen. Pulsar is so good at making the display look clear that it shows frame gen ghosting/artifacts clearly as well. Some games look really smooth with frame gen with little to no artifacts while others look terrible and you notice bad frame pacing which then keeps pulsar from actually doing a good job.
I would just stick to lossless. I can personally handle visual issues as long as the motion is smooth.liquidshadowfox wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 23:00Pulsar looks good in some games when you use frame gen. Pulsar is so good at making the display look clear that it shows frame gen ghosting/artifacts clearly as well. Some games look really smooth with frame gen with little to no artifacts while others look terrible and you notice bad frame pacing which then keeps pulsar from actually doing a good job.
Read up on presentation models in Windows.
Because tearing & improper frame pacing is a far bigger detriment in CS2.
A lower resolution doesn't necessarily result in lower present-to-present time (what you see on the vast majority of overlays) aka higher 'FPS'.
G-SYNC Pulsar (VRR+Strobing) is a form ofrolling scan multi-strobe PWM. They're implemented on models with a QD-based WLED backlight.rnk0 wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:01Another thing I'm curious about:
Asus ROG Strix XG248QSG Ace
this monitor is said to have "ELMB Sync" which is a "lower" form of ELMB with VRR enabled.
Isn't that just Pulsar without the name?? And yes, maybe it's more like 50% strobing, not sure, doesn't mention it. But since it would be 600Hz without the Overclock...that's still 1200Hz clarity or so, with VRR, right? Better than the Pulsar monitors for CS2!
Most of the time yes lossless is better, there are some games where DLSS frame gen is better with no artifacts and just as smooth presentation but nobody is going to document all those cases so yea lossless is sure fire as long as you have enough gpu headroom.whitespider999 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 06:00I would just stick to lossless. I can personally handle visual issues as long as the motion is smooth.liquidshadowfox wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 23:00Pulsar looks good in some games when you use frame gen. Pulsar is so good at making the display look clear that it shows frame gen ghosting/artifacts clearly as well. Some games look really smooth with frame gen with little to no artifacts while others look terrible and you notice bad frame pacing which then keeps pulsar from actually doing a good job.
liquidshadowfox wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 10:36Most of the time yes lossless is better, there are some games where DLSS frame gen is better with no artifacts and just as smooth presentation but nobody is going to document all those cases so yea lossless is sure fire as long as you have enough gpu headroom.whitespider999 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 06:00I would just stick to lossless. I can personally handle visual issues as long as the motion is smooth.liquidshadowfox wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 23:00Pulsar looks good in some games when you use frame gen. Pulsar is so good at making the display look clear that it shows frame gen ghosting/artifacts clearly as well. Some games look really smooth with frame gen with little to no artifacts while others look terrible and you notice bad frame pacing which then keeps pulsar from actually doing a good job.
whitespider999 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 17:10It's interesting to me how there's relatively few reviews, testimonials, and no availability outside of usa, on something that's pretty ground breaking like this.