Blur Busters Forums

passballtotucker wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2026, 20:49

I'd be satisfied with playing games at 60fps with this clarity, but now I have to deal with vsync lag.

kyube wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2026, 18:54

There's genuinely no way they've only allowed good tuning for ULMB on the 60Hz refresh rate setting....
I refuse to believe such levels of little care was put into making the FW update good...
There's no way only the 60Hz mode is a global scan solution, when the display has the ability to use rolling scan...
Someone pinch me, this has to be a nightmare?

edgintheledge wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2026, 00:00

I filmed the 60hz mode with my phone's 240fps slowmo (flashing warning). Looks like a full screen pulse, unless it's doing something unexpected that would need a faster camera to see. I assume if it was rolling in any way, the camera and screen would eventually desync slightly and show frames with the screen partially illuminated. That effect only happens on camera when I try ≥120hz

mawi wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2026, 07:32

Well, I have also tested this update last night and I am not as happy as everyone else.
Yes, the clear double image when going below 90 fps is gone... But it seems like at the cost of having clear image at 120 fps?! What did they do? I played RE9 with 2x frame gen for many days now with perfect picture clarity and I cannot retrieve this anymore. Now its still some kind of clear when walking straight or strafing sideways and looking at the wall. But when panning the mouse fast while looking around, I see everything multiple times. That was clearly not the case before.

I also cannot see any benefit on high FPS games like CS2. I was hoping the announcement of working better during irregular frametimes fixes the situation with reflex on and having rather low 1%fps compared to average. But this has not changed. Having 300fps on average and 100 fps lows with reflex on still leads to noticable stutters.

So I still need RTSS, reflex and vsync off to get this smoothened out and having 240 fps lows.

The CS2 thing is fine with me. They did not announce much regarding improvements on high FPS segment. And there is a proper workaround. But RE9s is so much worse, I have no idea to fix it. I tried 120hz ULMB as with 2x frame gen I am anywaya above 120 and setting 120 as target fps within RE9. That looked even worse.

For now it looks like they added some options for 60hz and improved some double image situations below 90fps at cost of visuals at the low 100fps range...

is it possible to downgrade the fw?

(also no improvements on black outs or the "pulsar is gone when waking up from standby)

edgintheledge wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2026, 00:00

kyube wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2026, 18:54

There's genuinely no way they've only allowed good tuning for ULMB on the 60Hz refresh rate setting....
I refuse to believe such levels of little care was put into making the FW update good...
There's no way only the 60Hz mode is a global scan solution, when the display has the ability to use rolling scan...
Someone pinch me, this has to be a nightmare?

I filmed the 60hz mode with my phone's 240fps slowmo (flashing warning). Looks like a full screen pulse, unless it's doing something unexpected that would need a faster camera to see. I assume if it was rolling in any way, the camera and screen would eventually desync slightly and show frames with the screen partially illuminated. That effect only happens on camera when I try ≥120hz

phpBB [video]

ashrr wrote: ↑

13 Mar 2026, 14:18

Can anyone with the AOC model check if they can adjust the pulse width at 60hz or 120hz? Can't seem to find an option for it. Also the 60hz mode looks really clear, it's so much better compared to pulsar at 330fps which for me is only a small bump in clarity over regular gsync.

hamza_tm wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2026, 07:47

Can anyone explain how the 60Hz clarity is so good and how that isn’t replicated on higher Hz? I’m somewhat confused.