mello wrote:Chill out, it is a common knowledge and i just repeated it. No harm done.
Proof by assertion. Just repeating something over and over again doesn't make it true. Thinking that spreading lies with no evidence to back it up is "No harm done." then there is really is no help for you.
mello wrote:And here you are perfectly right, it doesn't make it true. But user complaints are out there, all over the place, and current AUO reputation is there for a reason.
What is confirmation bias?

I've yet to hear of this reputation does that mean that it doesn't exist? No, that's why it's very important to have numbers to back it up.
mello wrote:True, but ignorance term is a funny one here. Why ? Because there are a lot of people that just put up with an inferior quality and product, they just accept it for what it is, they never complain and they just try to get used to certain flaws. For them is it not the end of the world, as long as quality is "acceptable" (different meaning per user) and can be tolerated in the long run. These never end up in any statistics so ignorance comment is a double edged sword in this case.
If this true for AUO, it's true for any panel manufacture. idk what your point is.
People taking photos of their monitors should be fired out of a cannon.
My ExPeNsIvE 4k 10bit Dell IPS that's not using a AUO panel has massive clouding and i should return it asap!

It even looks worse then someone AUO IPS 165hz that they returned!
https://i.imgur.com/F7wCpLp.jpg
Oh wait, it looks fine in a realistic scenario.
This is why it's so important to have numbers and not go by what people are saying. I've experienced it in person were someone i knew was saying how bad their backlight bleed was but when i checked it out in person it looked fine... they were going off the photos and were not LOOKING with their eyes
If you wanted black blacks, get a VA panel with a better contrast ratio. If it's IPS then it's probably 1000:1 and don't expect any better.