Oh that's unfortunate but good to know, thanks. Can his response time charts be used for a apples to apples comparison?
esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Pursuits are still usable tho.
From what I see both XL' and PG' are measured with same "10-90% of luminance" method so yes. But keep in mind its not really a 1.5 ms due to choice of this method.
Actually PG's extreme overdrive has the same avg 21,6% overshoot as XL's premium overdrive. So that's perhaps a good panel-vs-panel comparison. Off vs off would be ideal. We can see TN has faster falling transitions while IPS has faster rising transitions. Although IPS GtG doesn't enter the yellow/orange area on this heatmap (notice the max response times). On average they turn out identical.
If TN panel had same factory optimizations as this IPS it would definitely outpace it.
Compare UFOs | Do you use Blur Reduction? | Smooth Frog | Latency Split Test
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Very interesting! Thank you for the explanation.Discorz wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 13:44Pursuits are still usable tho.
From what I see both XL' and PG' are measured with same "10-90% of luminance" method so yes. But keep in mind its not really a 1.5 ms due to choice of this method.
Actually PG's extreme overdrive has the same avg 21,6% overshoot as XL's premium overdrive. So that's perhaps a good panel-vs-panel comparison. Off vs off would be ideal. We can see TN has faster falling transitions while IPS has faster rising transitions. Although IPS GtG doesn't enter the yellow/orange area on this heatmap (notice the max response times). On average they turn out identical.
If TN panel had same factory optimizations as this IPS it would definitely outpace it.
Does that mean that this IPS panel has already caught up massively to the new 360hz Fast-TN panels in terms of motion blur and response times? (Compared to the previous 360hz IPS models)
That would be impressive
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Seems like it, even the YouTuber you posted this from also stated this in his video.SvenL wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 14:51Very interesting! Thank you for the explanation.Discorz wrote: ↑06 Nov 2022, 13:44Pursuits are still usable tho.
From what I see both XL' and PG' are measured with same "10-90% of luminance" method so yes. But keep in mind its not really a 1.5 ms due to choice of this method.
Actually PG's extreme overdrive has the same avg 21,6% overshoot as XL's premium overdrive. So that's perhaps a good panel-vs-panel comparison. Off vs off would be ideal. We can see TN has faster falling transitions while IPS has faster rising transitions. Although IPS GtG doesn't enter the yellow/orange area on this heatmap (notice the max response times). On average they turn out identical.
If TN panel had same factory optimizations as this IPS it would definitely outpace it.
Does that mean that this IPS panel has already caught up massively to the new 360hz Fast-TN panels in terms of motion blur and response times? (Compared to the previous 360hz IPS models)
That would be impressive
CPU: AMD R7 5800x3D ~ PBO2Tuner -30 ~ no C states
RAM: Gskill Bdie 2x16gb TridentZ Neo ~ CL16-16-16-36 1T ~ fine tuned latency
GPU: ASUS TUF 3080 10G OC Edition(v1/non-LHR) ~ disabled Pstates ~ max oced
OS: Fine tuned Windows 10 Pro, manual tuned.
Monitor: Alienware AW2521H ~ mix of ULMB/Gsync @ 240hz/360hz
More specs: https://kit.co/Kyouki/the-pc-that-stomps-you
RAM: Gskill Bdie 2x16gb TridentZ Neo ~ CL16-16-16-36 1T ~ fine tuned latency
GPU: ASUS TUF 3080 10G OC Edition(v1/non-LHR) ~ disabled Pstates ~ max oced
OS: Fine tuned Windows 10 Pro, manual tuned.
Monitor: Alienware AW2521H ~ mix of ULMB/Gsync @ 240hz/360hz
More specs: https://kit.co/Kyouki/the-pc-that-stomps-you
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Actually looks like TN is still a hair faster. Zowie doesn't need as much overdrive gain to achieve same avg response, at least at 360Hz (OD 15 vs OD Normal). But god they are close!
Compare UFOs | Do you use Blur Reduction? | Smooth Frog | Latency Split Test
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Can someone tell him not to do that?
Maybe chief?
Monitor: Gigabyte M27Q X
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11680
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
I can confirm that 360 Hz "fast" TN (e.g. E-TN) is currently faster than most 360 Hz IPS.
The leapfrogging did happen again, even if the best 240Hz IPS is now faster than some of the early 240Hz TN.
If you're just buying 240 Hz, IPS is already (practically) caught up, but now in 360+ Hz territory, TN had recently gotten the trophy again with the XL2566K.
But IPS has more speed jumps, and we're seeing continued leapfrogging.
The leapfrogging did happen again, even if the best 240Hz IPS is now faster than some of the early 240Hz TN.
If you're just buying 240 Hz, IPS is already (practically) caught up, but now in 360+ Hz territory, TN had recently gotten the trophy again with the XL2566K.
But IPS has more speed jumps, and we're seeing continued leapfrogging.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
- Chief Blur Buster
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11680
- Joined: 05 Dec 2013, 15:44
- Location: Toronto / Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Ugh.
It's definitely a good question.
But the Vicious Cycle Effect kind of applies here where 1440p is motion-blurrier than 1080p at the same refresh rate (higher resolutions amplify refresh rate limitations).
Human eye tracking capability is partially limited by how long an object is onscreen for -- if it moves too fast, you can't notice the motion blur. 1 screenwidth/sec is a pretty comfortable eye tracking speed.
So there's pros/cons of this approach.
Better yet for a reviewer to offer multiple visualizations:
pixel/sec-perspective, set as 960pps
pixel/sec-perspective, set as 1920pps
screenwidth/sec-perspective, set as 0.5 screenwidth/sec
screenwidth/sec-perspective, set as 1 screenwidth/sec
I'd rather standardize on multiple of 960 pixels/sec, or screenwidth/sec.
I need to do some thinking about reviewer education, because I understand why some would use screenwidth/sec. Tough call.
Head of Blur Busters - BlurBusters.com | TestUFO.com | Follow @BlurBusters on Twitter
Forum Rules wrote: 1. Rule #1: Be Nice. This is published forum rule #1. Even To Newbies & People You Disagree With!
2. Please report rule violations If you see a post that violates forum rules, then report the post.
3. ALWAYS respect indie testers here. See how indies are bootstrapping Blur Busters research!
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
This is awesome! But since "10%-90% of luminance" was measured when measuring with 0% to 100% GtG instead, could the result differ more? Or will the ratio remain roughly the same?
Re: esports 1440p 360hz displays announced
Can't say for 0-100% but for 3-97% + gamma correction is about 60% slower difference, roughly speaking.
Compare UFOs | Do you use Blur Reduction? | Smooth Frog | Latency Split Test
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup
Alienware AW2521H, Gigabyte M32Q, Asus VG279QM, Alienware AW2518HF, AOC C24G1, AOC G2790PX, Setup