Blur Busters Forums

soul4kills wrote: ↑

29 May 2026, 03:05

Vocaleyes wrote: ↑

25 May 2026, 17:39

There's no need to get the hump buddy, I'm simply informing you of my observations which to reiterate results in observable smoother camera panning. I really have no need to prove anything regarding this topic and what was a simple observation has now become mildly exhausting. Good luck going forward!

Why even reply and make a claim if you're not willing to back up your claim? I'm even helping you out to show you how you could do that.

At least I'm providing factual numbers and logic to why 2000hz-8000hz is placebo. And everyone's argument is just, trust me bro.

But I think you kind of exposed the reason why. Because all of you are testing the change from 1000hz - 8000hz. Of course you'll feel a difference. Because that difference is really happening at 2000hz. But once you actually tested 2000hz - 8000hz you felt not change, but you're so inclined to not be wrong you still said there is a difference, when really there is not.