1000Hz Dual Mode Leaked

[Discorz]

New leak lists AOC 27" QHD 500Hz/FHD 1000Hz dual-mode monitor for 2026. FHD is a possible typo, so it's most likely HD 720p.

https://videocardz.com/newz/aoc-to-laun ... h-5k-165hz
https://www.ithome.com/0/894/410.htm

BadSeed Tech - 720Hz fps at 1ppf speed = 1px motion blur.jpg (443.68 KiB) Viewed 1102 times

[Chief Blur Buster]

New leak lists AOC 27" QHD 500Hz/FHD 1000Hz dual-mode monitor for 2026. FHD is a possible typo, so it's most likely HD 720p.

Keep in mind 720 Hz OLED outperforms 1000 Hz LCD by a significant amount in the motion blur tests, even at 1920 pixels/sec.

I now recommend 1920 pixels/sec going forward for 500 Hz monitors. I may make it the new default speed in TestUFO Ghosting.

[RealNC]

DisplayPort and HDMI standards need to keep up here. You can only push DSC so far before it starts looking like a low quality JPEG.

Also, small correction: it's QHD/HD.

[Discorz]

Keep in mind 720 Hz OLED outperforms 1000 Hz LCD by a significant amount in the motion blur tests, even at 1920 pixels/sec.

I now recommend 1920 pixels/sec going forward for 500 Hz monitors. I may make it the new default speed in TestUFO Ghosting.

True for eye tracking tests! We already have a similar situation with 750Hz TN vs 480Hz OLED. Here is a nice example:

750Hz TN vs 480Hz OLED at ~2000pps tracking - Little Snowman Brothers.png (1.19 MiB) Viewed 944 times

source: https://youtu.be/n3YYKqQboGM?si=9UUuonDV3ZLzMRl-&t=84

Sooner or later, default speed will need to be increased. This will make MPRT/GtG differences more noticeable and help minimize deviations in target speed. Currently, 720–600 Hz displays pan at 720–1200 pps when using the 960 pps preset, which is a notable 25% deviation. Increasing the speeds will reduce these errors.

[purplemelon1]

Keep in mind 720 Hz OLED outperforms 1000 Hz LCD by a significant amount in the motion blur tests, even at 1920 pixels/sec.

I now recommend 1920 pixels/sec going forward for 500 Hz monitors. I may make it the new default speed in TestUFO Ghosting.

True for eye tracking tests! We already have a similar situation with 750Hz TN vs 480Hz OLED. Here is a nice example:


750Hz TN vs 480Hz OLED at ~2000pps tracking - Little Snowman Brothers.png
source: https://youtu.be/n3YYKqQboGM?si=9UUuonDV3ZLzMRl-&t=84

Sooner or later, default speed will need to be increased. This will make MPRT/GtG differences more noticeable and help minimize deviations in target speed. Currently, 720–600 Hz displays pan at 720–1200 pps when using the 960 pps preset, which is a notable 25% deviation. Increasing the speeds will reduce these errors.

Any idea why the maker didnt use higher shutterspeeds like 960/1500 or 1920 /1? Shouldn't even phone cameras not darken the image too much?

[Chief Blur Buster]

Any idea why the maker didnt use higher shutterspeeds like 960/1500 or 1920 /1? Shouldn't even phone cameras not darken the image too much?

See the tool tips at https://testufo.com/ghosting -- Long exposure speeds for pursuit cameras are intentional to emulate human eye, to get WYSIWYG motion blur photography. It's a scientifically peer reviewed inventon. The standard is to configure the shutter to 4x refresh cycle to match the human-perceived display motion blur.

Conference paper at blurbusters.com/motion-tests/pursuit-camera-paper/

Tracking camera = Tracking eyeball.
(Moving camera as an analog of a moving eyeball).

Short shutter speeds make it inaccurate for the pursuit camera. Look at how sharp the 720Hz picture is despite a slow shutter speed on a moving camera -- that means the display is so fantastic at blur busting it even busts camera-panning blur too.

download/file.php?id=6506

Screenshot 2025-11-17 at 6.53.35 PM.png (433.36 KiB) Viewed 104 times

[purplemelon1]

Any idea why the maker didnt use higher shutterspeeds like 960/1500 or 1920 /1? Shouldn't even phone cameras not darken the image too much?

See the tool tips at https://testufo.com/ghosting -- Long exposure speeds for pursuit cameras are intentional to emulate human eye, to get WYSIWYG motion blur photography. It's a scientifically peer reviewed inventon. The standard is to configure the shutter to 4x refresh cycle to match the human-perceived display motion blur.

Conference paper at blurbusters.com/motion-tests/pursuit-camera-paper/

Tracking camera = Tracking eyeball.
(Moving camera as an analog of a moving eyeball).

Short shutter speeds make it inaccurate for the pursuit camera. Look at how sharp the 720Hz picture is despite a slow shutter speed on a moving camera -- that means the display is so fantastic at blur busting it even busts camera-panning blur too.

download/file.php?id=6506
Screenshot 2025-11-17 at 6.53.35 PM.png

Thanks. I see the tick stuff is key.